May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Polarized Distribution of RPE Membrane Markers in Bone Spicules Pigment Present in RP Donor Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.G. Hollyfield
    Cole Eye Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • V.L. Bonilha
    Cole Eye Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.G. Hollyfield, None; V.L. Bonilha, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH grants EY14240 and EY15638, The Foundation Fighting Blindness (Res. Center grant) and CCF funds
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 3050. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.G. Hollyfield, V.L. Bonilha; Polarized Distribution of RPE Membrane Markers in Bone Spicules Pigment Present in RP Donor Eyes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):3050.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose:A fundus hallmark in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the presence of bone spicule pigment. These structures are formed by the migration of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells to perivascular sites in the inner retina. Very little is available in the literature about the maintenance of polarity markers in these RPE cells that have withdrawn from the from the RPE monolayer. The present study analyzes the distribution of several well–known plasma membrane RPE proteins. Methods: The tissues used are from the FFB Eye Donor Collection maintained in the Cole Eye Institute. Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer. The globes were slit through the pars plana; after removal of the anterior segments the fundus was photographed and the tissue transferred to 2% paraformaldehyde prepared in PBS. The postmortem time varied between 7.5 to 21.5 hours. Cryostat tissue sections were studied by indirect immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy, using well–characterized antibodies to several established apical (ezrin, vitronectin receptor) and basolateral RPE markers (ß–catenin, Glut–1 transporter and laminin, among others). The RP eyes were compared to compatible normal donor eye. Results: Ezrin, an actin binding protein, was present on the apical surface of the translocated RPE cells, opposite to the laminin basal marker in the bone spicules. On the other hand, the vitronectin receptor co–distributed along the basal surface of the translocated RPE cells. Glut–1 and &ß–catenin were both localized to the lateral membrane of the translocated RPE cells. Conclusions: The immunocytochemical data obtained suggests that translocated RPE cells keep the polarized distribution of their plasma membrane proteins. However, the re–distribution of some proteins such as the vitronectin receptor to the basal surface is observed. This re–distribution of some of the plasma membrane proteins must be correlated to their function in the bone spicules in retina.

Keywords: retinal degenerations: cell biology • retinal pigment epithelium • retinitis 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.