May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
How Local Is the Multifocal ERG
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Parks
    Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hosp, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • S. Dudgeon
    Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hosp, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • A. Groundland
    Vision Sciences, Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • S. Afzal
    Vision Sciences, Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • D. Keating
    Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hosp, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Parks, None; S. Dudgeon, None; A. Groundland, None; S. Afzal, None; D. Keating, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 3434. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Parks, S. Dudgeon, A. Groundland, S. Afzal, D. Keating; How Local Is the Multifocal ERG . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):3434.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To investigate the relative scatter contributions to local multifocal ERG responses. Methods: The local multifocal ERG response consists of a local a lateral and a scatter component. However the balance of these contributions to the local responses is unknown. By creating areas of low or high sensitivity to scatter it is possible to estimate the level of neighbouring scatter contributions on the local mfERG response. Seven healthy controls underwent a series of experiments using a fixed mfERG stimulus paradigm with an inactive 3rd and 4th ring. These inactive regions were presented at three fixed luminance levels (black, grey and white). The relative amplitude of surrounding active rings was measured and compared for normal stimulation and at these fixed luminance levels. Results: There was on average a 15% increase in response amplitude in local areas when the surrounding area was fixed at a low (black) luminance. At mean (grey) luminance response amplitudes displayed a less than a 1% variation in responses and at full (white) luminance there was a 20% decrease in response amplitudes. Conclusions: There is a significant scatter contribution to the local response from surrounding areas. These results indicate that at least 20% of the local responses is reflective of activity outside the area of interest.

Keywords: electroretinography: clinical • electrophysiology: clinical • clinical research methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×