May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Visual Field Asymmetry Is Unrelated to Intraocular Pressure Asymmetry in the Low–Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D.S. Greenfield
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Inst, Palm Beach Gardens, FL
  • J.M. Liebmann
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, New York, NY
  • R. Ritch
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • T. Krupin
    Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
  • Low–pressure Glaucoma Study Group
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Inst, Palm Beach Gardens, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.S. Greenfield, None; J.M. Liebmann, None; R. Ritch, None; T. Krupin, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  unrestricted grant to the Low–pressure Glaucoma Study Group from Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 3577. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D.S. Greenfield, J.M. Liebmann, R. Ritch, T. Krupin, Low–pressure Glaucoma Study Group; Visual Field Asymmetry Is Unrelated to Intraocular Pressure Asymmetry in the Low–Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):3577.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the association of baseline IOP and visual field (VF) parameters in the Low–pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study (LoGTS). Methods: LoGTS is a randomized, double–masked trial to evaluate VF stability in patients randomized to topical twice–daily brimonidine tartrate 0.2% versus twice daily timolol maleate 0.5%. LPG was defined as open angle glaucoma with a glaucomatous VF defect in at least one eye on Humphrey 24–2 full–threshold standard automatic perimetry and all known IOP < 22 mmHg. Baseline measurements included untreated diurnal IOP curve (8 am, 10 am, 12 pm, and 4 pm), central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements, and stereophotography. A baseline VF was created using the average of two Humphrey 24–2 full–threshold exams. Results:190 patients were enrolled (mean age 64.9 ± 10.7 yrs) with an average VF mean deviation (MD) of –5.7 ± 4.1 dB. VF MD and PSD were not correlated with CCT or mean, peak, trough, or peak – trough (P–T) IOP (p=0.2–0.9, ANOVA). CCT was significantly associated with mean, peak, and trough IOP (p=0.002–0.008). Among patients with unilateral VF loss (N=53, 27.9%), there were no differences (p=0.3 –0.9, paired t–test) in any IOP parameter between fellow normal and glaucomatous eyes: mean diurnal IOP (15.7 ± 2.3, 16.0 ± 2.5) peak IOP (17.1 ± 2.6, 17.4 ± 2.6) trough IOP (14.1 ± 2.4, 14.5 ± 2.7) and P–T IOP (3.0 ± 1.5, 2.8 ± 1.5). Among patients with bilateral VF loss (N=137, 72.1%), mean, peak, trough, and P–T IOP were similar in eyes with better VF MD compared to eyes with worse VF MD (p=0.2–0.7, paired t–test). Cross–classified 3 X 3 contingency tables demonstrated no relationship between IOP and VF MD using chi–square analysis in all patients (p = 0.13), bilateral patients (p = 0.61), or unilateral patients (p = 0.11) and Goodman–Kruskal's index of association in all patients (0.06), bilateral patients (0.01), and unilateral patients (0.07).Conclusions:Contrary to previous reports, baseline VF asymmetry is unrelated to untreated IOP asymmetry in LPG.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled • intraocular pressure • visual fields 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.