May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Conversion of Age–Specific Normative Differential Luminance Sensitivity Obtained With the Tuebingen Computer Campimeter and the Octopus 101 Perimeter
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Hermann
    Dept. II, University Eye Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • J. Paetzold
    Dept. II, University Eye Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • R. Vonthein
    Departement of Medical Biometry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • E. Krapp
    Dept. II, University Eye Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • S. Rauscher
    Dept. II, University Eye Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • U. Schiefer
    Dept. II, University Eye Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A. Hermann, None; J. Paetzold, Haag–Streit F; R. Vonthein, None; E. Krapp, None; S. Rauscher, None; U. Schiefer, Haag–Streit F, P, R.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4321. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Hermann, J. Paetzold, R. Vonthein, E. Krapp, S. Rauscher, U. Schiefer; Conversion of Age–Specific Normative Differential Luminance Sensitivity Obtained With the Tuebingen Computer Campimeter and the Octopus 101 Perimeter . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4321.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To convert age specific normative hills of vision from the Tuebingen Computer Campimeter (TCC) to the Octopus 101. Methods: Static automated perimetry within the central 30° was conducted with TCC and Octopus 101 in a randomised order on 83 eyes of 83 ophthalmologically healthy subjects (approximately12 per decade) aged between 10 and 79 years. For each test, we used an identical grid of 68 circularly arranged points with centripetal test point condensation, representing the approximately rotation symmetric 30°–hill of vision. On TCC the examination was run with a 4–2–1–1 staircase strategy (4 reversals), on Octopus 101 with a 4–2–2–(1) staircaise strategy (3 reversals). Thresholds of differential luminance sensitivity (DLS) were estimated by the maximum–likelihood method. In both devices, background luminance was kept constant at 10 cd/m2. For the TCC, as well as for the Octopus 101, a smooth mathematical model called hill of vision was fitted to the normative data. For conversion, DLS differences per subject and per location were analyzed. Results: The model fit was satisfactory (R2 = 0.78 for the TCC and R2 = 0.74 for the Octopus). The model was defined by the variables age, eccentricity, cyclic transforms of angle and their interactions and random factor "subject". Mean threshold difference between Octopus and TCC was 1.1 dB. The DLS differences depended on eccentricity. The minimal difference occurred at an eccentricity of 15° (0.6 dB). DLS differences increased towards the centre (2.1 dB) and towards the periphery (2.1dB at 30°). The converting formula was estimated to the 2nd degree polynomial in eccentricity: DLSOctopus = DLSTCC + 2.1 dB – 0.195 dB/deg * ecc + 0.00645 dB/deg2 * ecc2. The effects of age and angle were negligible. Standard deviations of both, reference values and differences, were 1.7 dB. Conclusions: When switching from the TCC to the Octopus instrument, a simple converting formula allows further use of normative DLS data and defect measures.

Keywords: perimetry • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×