May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Vectorial Analysis of Astigmatism After Lasik: A Comparative Study of 3 Laser Systems
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Viggiano
    Cornea, Hosp de Nuestra Sra de la Luz, Mexico City, Mexico
  • O. Guerrero
    Cornea, Hosp de Nuestra Sra de la Luz, Mexico City, Mexico
  • R. Velasco
    Cornea, Hosp de Nuestra Sra de la Luz, Mexico City, Mexico
  • O. Baca
    Cornea, Hosp de Nuestra Sra de la Luz, Mexico City, Mexico
  • M. Calvillo
    Cornea, Hosp de Nuestra Sra de la Luz, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Viggiano, None; O. Guerrero, None; R. Velasco, None; O. Baca, None; M. Calvillo, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4323. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Viggiano, O. Guerrero, R. Velasco, O. Baca, M. Calvillo; Vectorial Analysis of Astigmatism After Lasik: A Comparative Study of 3 Laser Systems . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4323.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To compare the incidence, type and grade of induced and residual astigmatism with Lasik, with 3 different laser systems. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal, comparative and observational study, including 3 group: Group 1: 120 eyes treated with Visx Star S2, Group 2: 86 eyes treated with Ladar Vision and Group 3: 107 eyes treated with Chiron Technolas 217. The calculation of the induced and residual astigmatism was made with a vectorial analysis at the first and third month. % cylinder correction, axial deviation and visual outcome were also considered for the analysis. Results: Group 1: The mean residual and induced astigmatism was 0.55 X 178.8 and 1.82 X 180 at the 3rd month. Group 2: The mean residual and induced astigmatism were 0.84 X 179.6 and 1.39 X 10.5 at the 3rd month respectively. Group 3: The mean residual and induced astigmatism were 0.62 X 164 and 1.82 X3.68 at the 3rd month respectively. The visual outcome was better for group 3. Conclusions: The Visx group showed the major stability of all systems. All the technologies studied showed good results treating low astimatisms. Each one of the them has their approved indications, so each case needs to be individualized.

Keywords: astigmatism 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×