May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Epi–LASIK Is Not Equal to Alcohol–Free LASEK
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Dai
    Ophthalmology, Eye/ENT Hosp Aff Fudan Univ, Shanghai, China
  • R. Chu
    Ophthalmology, Eye/ENT Hosp Aff Fudan Univ, Shanghai, China
  • C. Chen
    Ophthalmology, Eye/ENT Hosp Aff Fudan Univ, Shanghai, China
  • X. Zhou
    Ophthalmology, Eye/ENT Hosp Aff Fudan Univ, Shanghai, China
  • J. Zou
    Ophthalmology, Eye/ENT Hosp Aff Fudan Univ, Shanghai, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Dai, None; R. Chu, None; C. Chen, None; X. Zhou, None; J. Zou, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4391. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Dai, R. Chu, C. Chen, X. Zhou, J. Zou; Epi–LASIK Is Not Equal to Alcohol–Free LASEK . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4391.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To analyze the difference in the histological ultrastructure of human corneal epithelial flap by Epi–LASIK and LASEK. Methods: 6 eyes of 6 patients and 4 eyes in vitro were included in this study. Epithelial flap was obtained by Epi–LASIK method using rotational epikeratome (Made in China) in 3 eyes of 3 patients and 2 eyes in vitro. And epithelial flap was created by LASEK technique in the other 5 eyes using 20% alcohol for 20 seconds. All specimens were assessed by light and electron microscopy, and the histological difference of the two methods was compared. Results: Epithelial flaps were created smoothly in all the 5 eyes of mechanical method and in 4 eyes of alcohol–assisted method. Epithelial flap was not intact in 1 eye. Light microscopic examination showed most of the basal border of the Epi–LASIK epithelial flap was continuous with occasional focal disruptions. There was no evident morphological abnormalities. The alcohol–assisted epithelial flap had significant interruption along the basal border of the epithelium. Bowman’s membrane and anterior stroma remained completely intact in any specimen for both methods. Transmission electron microscopy showed that most of the basement membrane of the mechanical epithelial flap was integrity. The lamina densa, lamina lucida and the hemidesmosomes had normal morphology along most of basement membrane. The basal cell showed normal ultrastructure. Most of the basement membrane was abnormal in specimens obtained with alcohol–assisted separation. Most lamina densa was absent and lamina lucida was interruption. The mitochondrion of basal cell was swelling and crista was disruption. And part of basal cell membrane was damaged. Conclusions: The cleavage plane of mechanically separated epithelial flap was underneath the basement membrane. Most of the basement membrane was integrity and cell morphology was normal. The cleavage plane of alcohol–assisted method was mostly between basal cell membrane and basement membrane. Basement membrane and the basal cell morphology were abnormal.

Keywords: refractive surgery: comparative studies • cornea: epithelium 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×