May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
The Effect of LASIK on Post–Op Physical Pupil Size
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.R. Lewis
    William H. Havener Eye Center,
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • C. Ford
    College of Medicine,
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • E. Herderick
    Biomedical Engineering,
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • A.M. Mahmoud
    Biomedical Engineering,
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • D. Castellano
    William H. Havener Eye Center,
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • R.G. Lembach
    William H. Havener Eye Center,
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • P. Vinciguerra
    Ophthalmology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy
  • C. Roberts
    William H. Havener Eye Center,
    Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
    Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.R. Lewis, None; C. Ford, None; E. Herderick, None; A.M. Mahmoud, None; D. Castellano, None; R.G. Lembach, None; P. Vinciguerra, None; C. Roberts, Bausch&Lomb F, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Bausch&Lomb
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4393. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.R. Lewis, C. Ford, E. Herderick, A.M. Mahmoud, D. Castellano, R.G. Lembach, P. Vinciguerra, C. Roberts; The Effect of LASIK on Post–Op Physical Pupil Size . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4393.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine whether physical pupil size is affected by LASIK. Methods: From a retrospective randomized study of 120 eyes of 60 patients, physical pupil size was calculated using the formula physical pupil diameter (PP, in mm) = measured pupil diameter (in mm)*(1–B) where B = anterior chamber depth (in meters)* central K (in Diopters)/1.3375. The measured pupil under dark conditions (Zywave, Bausch&Lomb), mean central K (Keratron Scout Optikon, Rome, Italy) and processed over central 3–mm region using OSUCTT software (Mahmoud AM, et al. IOVS 2000;41:ARVO Abstract 3599) and anterior chamber depth (Orbscan, Bausch&Lomb) were collected pre– and six–months post–LASIK. Subjects were divided into two groups by different surgeon. Group A eyes were treated in pairs by a Technolas 217A (Bausch&Lomb) and LADARVision 4000 (Autonomous) for each eye and Group B eyes the Technolas 217A and the Star S3 (VISX). Analysis of variance (SAS) was used to compare the mean difference in physical pupil size between the two groups post–LASIK. Results: The mean difference in physical pupil diameter at 6 months post– versus pre–LASIK for all subjects was 0.19±0.50mm and ANOVA confirmed that the difference was signficantly non–zero (P>.01). ANOVA analysis of the mean difference in postop PP for each group was 0.32±0.47 for Group A that was significanly non–zero (P>.01) and 0.054±0.50 for Group B that was not significantly non–zero (P=.41). Conclusions: The calculated mean physical pupil diameter significantly increased following LASIK across all eyes. The measured increased effect was observed in Group A (P>.01) however not in Group B (P=.41).

Keywords: refractive surgery: LASIK • pupil 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×