May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Changes in Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) After Vitrectomy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Ueno
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • M. Kondo
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • Y. Niwa
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • C.–H. Piao
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • T. Asano
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • K. Ikenoya
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • H. Terasaki
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • Y. Miyake
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Ueno, None; M. Kondo, None; Y. Niwa, None; C. Piao, None; T. Asano, None; K. Ikenoya, None; H. Terasaki, None; Y. Miyake, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  14370557 (HT) the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4546. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Ueno, M. Kondo, Y. Niwa, C.–H. Piao, T. Asano, K. Ikenoya, H. Terasaki, Y. Miyake; Changes in Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) After Vitrectomy . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4546.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The photopic negative response (PhNR) is a negative component of photopic ERG appearing after the b–wave, and was suggested to reflect the activity of ganglion cells and their axons. It has been shown that patients with glaucoma or optic nerve diseases have a selective reduction in the PhNR. In this study surgical damage of the retina was estimated by photopic ERG including PhNR. Methods: Photopic ERGs were recorded from 20 eyes of 19 patients with an idiopathic macular hole (IMH) and 14 eyes of 14 patients with an epiretinal membrane (ERM) before and 3 months after vitrectomy. Patients with IMH underwent vitrectomy with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling assisted by indocyanine green and fluid gas exchange. Patients with ERM underwent vitrectomy with membrane peeling. Photopic ERGs were elicited by white Ganzfeld flashes (1.91 cd–s /m2) on a rod suppressing blue background (18 cd/m2). The amplitude of the a–, b–wave, and PhNR of the photopic ERGs were analyzed. Goldmann perimetry was also performed before and after surgery. Results: There was no significant difference in the amplitudes of a– and b–waves before and after surgery for both IMH and ERM patients. The amplitude of the PhNR in the IMH group was reduced significantly after surgery (pre–surgery, 31.5±11.8 µV; post–surgery, 22.5±13.9 µV; P = 0.047). The PhNR in the ERM group did not change significantly (pre–surgery, 26.6±11.2 µV, post–surgery, 22.8±13.8 µV; P = 0.33). None of the patients in both groups had a visual field loss after surgery. Conclusions:Subclinical functional damage in the inner retinal layer after vitrectomy was suggested in patients with IMH.

Keywords: electroretinography: clinical • vitreoretinal surgery • ganglion cells 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×