May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
On–/Off – Ganzfeld ERG With LED Stimulation in Normal Subjects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Gottschalk
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ. of Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • A. Jünemann
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ. of Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • F.K. Horn
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ. of Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Gottschalk, None; A. Jünemann, None; F.K. Horn, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  DFG SFB 539
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4548. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Gottschalk, A. Jünemann, F.K. Horn; On–/Off – Ganzfeld ERG With LED Stimulation in Normal Subjects . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4548.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: Recent work indicates the diagnostic values of the photopic negative response (PhNR) and the long duration stimulus. Aim was to record the on– and off– responses of the photopic ganzfeld electroretinogram (ERG) using a LED stimulator and to explore how each ERG component (a–, b– wave, PhNR in on–set, d–wave, PhNR in off–set) changes in different stimulus condition. Methods: Photopic Ganzfeld ERGs were recorded in response to a white bright LED flash on a white background. Background illumination was changed in 5cd/m2 steps from 15cd/m2 to 30cd/m2. Flash intensities were 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120cd/m2. Using constant flash duration (250ms) the off– period was 250, 350, 500 and 750ms. The ERGs were recorded with a JET contact lens electrode. Complete series were studied in two normal subjects. Nine normal subject and 5 glaucoma patients have been studied with all flashes and off periods at a background illumination of 20 cd/m2. Results: PhNR was not significantly influenced by the variation of background intensity or inter stimulus interval as used in this study. At a fixed background illumination the PhNR–on, the b–wave, the d–wave increased with increasing flash intensities while PhNR–off stayed constant. Comparison to the results of normals and glaucomas, differences were most expressed in PhNR of the offset component. Conclusions: On and off response of the human ERG depend on increasing flash intensity. The off period and background illumination seems to have no significant influence in the amplitude of the off– and on–PhNR. Glaucoma patients show a reduction of the amplitude of the PhNR following the d–wave. These results indicate that separate analysis of on–and off– PhNR might be helpful in glaucoma examination.

Keywords: electrophysiology: clinical • clinical research methodology 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.