May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Acute Unilateral Cone Dysfunction Syndrome
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N. Kondo
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch of Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • M. Kondo
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch of Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • T. Asano
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch of Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • M. Nakamura
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch of Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • Y. Ito
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch of Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • H. Terasaki
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch of Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • Y. Miyake
    Ophthalmology, Nagoya Univ Sch of Med, Nagoya, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N. Kondo, None; M. Kondo, None; T. Asano, None; M. Nakamura, None; Y. Ito, None; H. Terasaki, None; Y. Miyake, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Grant–in Aid14770952 from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4551. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N. Kondo, M. Kondo, T. Asano, M. Nakamura, Y. Ito, H. Terasaki, Y. Miyake; Acute Unilateral Cone Dysfunction Syndrome . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4551.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To report three Japanese patients who presented with an acute–onset, unilateral cone dysfunction. Methods: Three patients underwent routine ophthalmological examinations in addition to fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, Goldmann visual field testing, full–field electroretinograms (ERGs), multifocal ERGs, and rod–cone perimetry. One of these patients has been reported previously (Nomura et al. Ophthalmology, 2000). Results: The fundus examination and fluorescein angiograms were essentially normal at the onset for all patients. The corrected visual acuity in the affected eyes was 0.03, 0.06, and 0.16. A relative central scotoma was detected in all patients. Full–field ERG cone responses were essentially absent, but rod responses were within the normal range in all patients. Psychophysical rod–cone perimetry demonstrated that the cone system was severely impaired at nearly all locations tested whereas the rod sensitivity was normal. Multifocal ERGs were non–detectable in all affected eyes. The fellow eyes were completely normal in all cases. Conclusions: These findings suggest that there is a group of patients who have an acute–onset, severe unilateral cone dysfunction leaving the rod function intact.

Keywords: electroretinography: clinical • retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×