May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Mapping the Visual Field Across the Life Span: The Toelz Temporal Topography Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D.A. Poggel
    Center for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Boston VA Medical Center, Boston, MA
    Generation Research Program (GRP),
    Ludwig–Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • C. Calmanti
    Generation Research Program (GRP),
    Ludwig–Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • B. Treutwein
    IuK,
    Ludwig–Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • H. Strasburger
    Generation Research Program (GRP),
    Ludwig–Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
    Medical Psychology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.A. Poggel, None; C. Calmanti, None; B. Treutwein, None; H. Strasburger, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Str 354/3–1
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4601. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D.A. Poggel, C. Calmanti, B. Treutwein, H. Strasburger; Mapping the Visual Field Across the Life Span: The Toelz Temporal Topography Study . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4601.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The capacity for processing visual information, especially in the temporal domain, is generally believed to deteriorate with age. However, the course, patterns, and mechanisms of this decline over the life span are largely unknown. Our goal was to elucidate the characteristics of visual processing and their change over time. Methods: We compared the visual field topography of 95 healthy subjects (10–90 years) with respect to luminance thresholds (static perimetry), temporal resolution (double–pulse resolution, DPR), simple reaction time (RT), and contrast thresholds as well as several non–topographical attentional and visual functions. Results: DPR thresholds increased with eccentricity and age. We observed a more pronounced performance decline in the periphery. RT increased only slightly and uniformly across the visual field in older subjects. Perimetric luminance thresholds rose in a pattern similar to the DPR maps. Contrast thresholds, alertness, divided and spatial attention, and saccadic exploration showed age–related changes and complex correlation patterns with the main outcome variables. Performance was almost constant up to the age of sixty; a marked decrease was observed late in life (80–90 years). Conclusions: The age–related decrease of visual performance was confirmed, but the topographical patterns of functional loss differ between outcome measures, even between those of temporal information processing. Age is a weak predictor of functionality, as interindividual variability is high, especially in old subjects. Visual and cognitive brain processes also affect the characteristics of visual field maps, i.e. age–related deterioration cannot be attributed exclusively to optic media and the retina. Our data provide a useful normative basis for psychophysical and neuropsychological studies.

Keywords: aging: visual performance • visual fields • temporal vision 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×