May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and Clinical Assessment of Stereoscopic Optic Disc Photographs for Diagnosing Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N.J. Reus
    Glaucoma Service, The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • H.G. Lemij
    Glaucoma Service, The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N.J. Reus, Laser Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. F; H.G. Lemij, Laser Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. F, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  The Rotterdam Eye Hospital Research Foundation; Stichting Glaucoomfonds, Leiden, The Netherlands
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4809. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N.J. Reus, H.G. Lemij; Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and Clinical Assessment of Stereoscopic Optic Disc Photographs for Diagnosing Glaucoma . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4809.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Abstract:
 

To determine and compare the accuracy of GDx VCC scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), HRT I confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO), and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic disc photographs for diagnosing glaucoma.

 

One eye each of 40 healthy subjects, 48 glaucoma patients, and 6 patients with ocular hypertension were measured with SLP and CSLO. In addition, simultaneous stereoscopic optic disc photographs were obtained in these eyes. Sixteen photographs of healthy and glaucomatous eyes were duplicated for assessing intraobserver agreement. Four glaucoma specialists, 4 general ophthalmologists, 4 residents in ophthalmology, and 4 optometrists classified the photographs as normal or glaucoma. For SLP, the Nerve Fiber Indicator (NFI) was analyzed. For CSLO, the Moorfields Regression Analysis (MRA) and the Bathija linear discriminant function (LDF) were used.

 

As has been shown in the Table, SLP had the highest diagnostic accuracy, followed by CSLO Bathija LDF. Glaucoma specialists had a similar accuracy for diagnosing glaucoma as CSLO MRA. Residents had the lowest diagnostic accuracy. The intraobserver agreement (kappa) for classifying the photographs ranged between 0.48 (within residents) and 0.78 (within glaucoma specialists). The interobserver agreement ranged between 0.45 (between residents) and 0.74 (between glaucoma specialists). The agreement between observers and CSLO MRA (kappa, 0.68) was statistically significantly higher (P < 0.001; paired t test) than between observers and SLP NFI (kappa, 0.60) and CSLO Bathija LDF (kappa, 0.62), suggesting that the latter two may be of added value to the clinician.

 

Automated analysis of measurements with GDx VCC and HRT I had a higher diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma than classification of stereoscopic optic disc photographs by glaucoma specialists, general ophthalmologists, residents in ophthalmology, and optometrists. The intra– and interobserver agreement for optic disc analysis was only moderate to good. We think imaging techniques may assist clinicians in managing glaucoma.

 

 

 
Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • nerve fiber layer • optic disc 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×