May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Intraocular Pressure Changes in Different Positions in Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma and Primary Open–Angle Glaucoma Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • F. Ozturk
    Department of Opthalmology, Afyon Kocatepe Univ Fac Med, Afyon, Turkey
  • S. Ermis
    Department of Opthalmology, Afyon Kocatepe Univ Fac Med, Afyon, Turkey
  • S. Yaman
    Department of Opthalmology, Afyon Kocatepe Univ Fac Med, Afyon, Turkey
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  F. Ozturk, None; S. Ermis, None; S. Yaman, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4829. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      F. Ozturk, S. Ermis, S. Yaman; Intraocular Pressure Changes in Different Positions in Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma and Primary Open–Angle Glaucoma Patients . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4829.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the relationship between postural changes and intraocular pressure (IOP) in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, primary open–angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal subjects.Methods: Fifteen pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, 10 POAG patients and 10 normal subjects were enrolled. IOP was measured 10 minutes after sitting, supine and prone positions using a Tono Pen (Mentor, USA). All of the glaucoma patients were receiving treatment. Results: The difference in age and gender among groups was statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Mean IOP in sitting, supine and prone positions were 17.3±3.7, 17.3±4.0, 19.3±3.1 mm–Hg in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma group, 17.8±4.0, 20.9±3.6, 21.7±1.7 mm–Hg in POAG group and 14.0±2.5, 15.5±3.5, 16.5±2.6 in normal subjects group respectively. In pseudoexfoliative glaucoma group IOP significantly changed in sitting to prone and supine to prone position alterations (p=0.012 and p=0.003). In POAG group IOP increases were significant when the patients changed from sitting to supine and sitting to prone positions (p=0.005 and p=0.008). In normal subjects the only significant difference was between sitting and prone positions (p=0.014). When the amount of IOP variations were compared among groups statistical signifance was detected in sitting to prone position change between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and POAG groups (p=0.003). Conclusions: The IOP increase in POAG group from sitting to supine position may be due to change in vascular factors and the increase in supine to prone position change may be due to change in biometric factors. These findings need further investigation.

Keywords: intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×