May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) in Individuals With Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) in the Reykjavik Eye Study (RES)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K.F. Damji
    Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • A. Arnarsson
    Ophthalmology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  • F. Jonasson
    Ophthalmology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  • H. Sasaki
    Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Japan
  • K. Sasaki
    Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K.F. Damji, None; A. Arnarsson, None; F. Jonasson, None; H. Sasaki, None; K. Sasaki, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4864. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K.F. Damji, A. Arnarsson, F. Jonasson, H. Sasaki, K. Sasaki; Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) in Individuals With Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) in the Reykjavik Eye Study (RES) . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4864.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: CCT is emerging as an important variable in the management of patients with or at risk for open–angle glaucoma. Very few studies, however, appear to have examined CCT in patients with or at risk for PEX. The purpose of this study is to determine if CCT of individuals with PEX is significantly different from individuals without PEX in a population based study of Caucasian individuals. Methods: Data from the RES (1996) was analyzed. CCT was measured with Scheimpflug photography. Individuals with corneal or intraocular surgery, as well as those where measurements could not be done, were excluded. Results: Of the 952 right eyes that met the eligibility criteria, there were 753 individuals with no slit lamp evidence of PEX with a dilated exam, 134 who were considered PEX suspects, and 65 with definite evidence of PEX (central disc and/or peripheral band on the lens capsule). The mean CCT (+/– SD) in each of these groups was 0.527 +/– 0.040, 0.529 +/– 0.036, and 0.533 +/– 0.032. After adjusting for age and sex, this difference was not statistically significant (p<0.4). Conclusions: Individuals with PEX in the RES have CCT values that are the same as individuals without PEX.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • clinical research methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×