May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Validity and Repeatability of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry When Used in Conjuction With a Prototype Sterile Barrier System
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.G. Flanagan
    Dept Ophthalmology & Vision Sci, Univ of Toronto/Toronto Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
    School of Optometry, Univeristy of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • J. Kerr
    Ophthalmology, Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, United Kingdom
  • V. Franklin
    Biomaterials Research Unit, CEAC, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • H. Gee
    Dept Ophthalmology & Vision Sci, First Water Ramsbury Ltd, Ramsbury, Marlborough, United Kingdom
  • B. Tighe
    Biomaterials Research Unit, CEAC, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.G. Flanagan, None; J. Kerr, Private P; V. Franklin, None; H. Gee, First Water Ramsbury Ltd E; B. Tighe, First Water Ramsbury Ltd C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Deparment of Health, UK
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4869. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.G. Flanagan, J. Kerr, V. Franklin, H. Gee, B. Tighe; Validity and Repeatability of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry When Used in Conjuction With a Prototype Sterile Barrier System . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4869.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To determine the differences between Goldmann applanation tonometry results with and without a prototype sterile barrier system. Methods:The prototype barrier system consists of a barrier film that is coated with an adhesive hydrogel. Protective liners maintain the adhesive layer and barrier film sterility until the device is used. 50 subjects consisting of two consecutive series of 25 subjects from two clinical sites. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by slit–lamp mounted Goldmann applanation tonometry, both with and without the sterile barrier. The order of measurement was randomized across the samples. Two IOP readings were taken for each condition. Results:IOP with the barrier was 16.76 ±2.19 mmHg and without the barrier was 16.38 ±2.06 mmHg. The Mean of Differences (MoD) was 0.38 ±0.62 mmHg, with a Coefficient of Repeatability (CoR) (95% CLs) of 1.21 mmHg. The mean of the two measurements taken with the barrier were 17.00 ±2.16 and 16.64 ±2.40 mmHg, with an MoD of 0.36 ±1.08, and a CoR of 2.11mmHg. The mean of the two measurements taken without the barrier were 16.56 ±2.18 and 16.20 ±2.06 mmHg, with an MoD of 0.36 ±1.04, and a CoR of 2.03mmHg. No adverse responses reported. Conclusions:The IOP was 0.38mmHg greater with the barrier than without. The difference was similar to that found between the two IOP measurements, both with and without the prototype sterile barrier.

Keywords: intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×