May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Studies of Lenticules After Epikeratoplasty for Keratoconus
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H. Nakamura
    Ophthal & Visual Science, University Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • F. Riley
    King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • H. Sakai
    Ophthal & Visual Science, University Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • W. Rademaker
    King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • B.Y. J. T. Yue
    Ophthal & Visual Science, University Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • D.P. Edward
    Ophthal & Visual Science, University Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL
    King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H. Nakamura, None; F. Riley, None; H. Sakai, None; W. Rademaker, None; B.Y.J.T. Yue, None; D.P. Edward, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH grants EY 03890 (BYJTY), EY 05628 (BYJTY) and EY01792 (core)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 4963. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H. Nakamura, F. Riley, H. Sakai, W. Rademaker, B.Y. J. T. Yue, D.P. Edward; Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Studies of Lenticules After Epikeratoplasty for Keratoconus . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):4963.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To examine histopathological and immunohistochemical changes in lenticules and host of corneal buttons from patients who previously underwent epikeratoplasty for keratoconus. Methods: Twelve penetrating keratoplasty specimens from keratoconus patients that previously underwent epikeratoplasty, eight keratoconus and seven normal corneas were examined. Immunostaining for Sp1, α1–proteinase inhibitor (α1–PI) and α2–macroglobulin (α2M) were performed. Results: In nine of the 12 lenticules, the keratoconus–like disruptions were found in Bowman’s layer. Peripheral and posterior keratocyte repopulation of the lenticules was observed in all cases. Keratocyte repopulation in the anterior and mid stromal regions of the lenticules appeared related to the duration since epikeratoplasty. Sp1 nuclear staining of the basal and wing epithelial cells was more intense in lenticules and keratoconus corneas than in normal corneas. Lenticular, host and keratoconus keratocytes showed positive Sp1 staining, whereas staining was absent in normal corneas. Compared to normal corneas, α1–PI and α2M immunostaining was weaker in the lenticules, host and keratoconus specimens. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of keratoconus–like breaks in Bowman’s layer in lenticules and remarkable keratocyte repopulation of the posterior stroma in the central lenticule from eyes that previously underwent epikeratoplasty as a treatment for keratoconus. The epithelial cells and keratocytes that repopulatedthe lenticules retained keratoconus–like biochemical abnormalities such as upregulation of Sp1 and downregulation of α1–PI and α2M. We speculate that both keratocytes and the corneal epithelium may participate in the development of keratoconus.

Keywords: keratoconus • immunohistochemistry • cornea: stroma and keratocytes 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×