May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Squeezing Eye–drops From Their Container – A Model Testing Variation Among Bottles
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. Nesher
    Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar–Saba, Israel
    Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • O. Ezra – Nimni
    Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar–Saba, Israel
  • E. Shumla
    Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar–Saba, Israel
  • J. Gur
    Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar–Saba, Israel
  • S. Hamisha
    Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar–Saba, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R. Nesher, None; O. Ezra – Nimni, None; E. Shumla, None; J. Gur, None; S. Hamisha, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 5373. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. Nesher, O. Ezra – Nimni, E. Shumla, J. Gur, S. Hamisha; Squeezing Eye–drops From Their Container – A Model Testing Variation Among Bottles . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):5373.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Abstract:
 

The ease of eye–drop extraction from its container has never been studied, although it may play an important factor in compliance to treatment in elderly or disabled patients. A model was designed to compare the strength required to extract drops from bottles of different manufacturers.

 

The model included a fixed portion to which the bottle was attached and a mobile portion – a lever with two arms. Mounting weights on the long arm led to squeezing of the bottle by the short arm. Weight for each bottle was determined in a staircase manner. Endpoint determined as the minimal weight (in grams) required to extract a drop from its container within 3 seconds. Three sets of 41 different topical agents were tested in a masked fashion. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA.

 

Six different groups of topical agents were tested. The table depicts for each group the force range (in grams) required to squeeze a drop out of the bottle.

 

 

When comparing agents of similar biochemical mechanism a significant difference was found among the beta– blockers, parasympatholytics and quinolone groups. No significant difference was found among the prostaglandin analogs, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and aminoglycoside groups.

 

This model produces a value which integrates the factors that may contribute to the force required to squeeze an eye–drop from its container. The results show a large variation among bottles. This may need to be taken into consideration when prescribing eye–drops to older individuals or patients with arthritic hand problems.

 

 
Keywords: pharmacology • quality of life • aging 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×