May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Macular Hole Surgery With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Three Day Prone Positioning
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.C. Wickens
    Ophthalmology, Washington University, St Louis, MO
    Barnes Retina Institute, St Louis, MO
  • G. Shah
    Ophthalmology, Washington University, St Louis, MO
    Barnes Retina Institute, St Louis, MO
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.C. Wickens, None; G. Shah, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 5429. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.C. Wickens, G. Shah; Macular Hole Surgery With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Three Day Prone Positioning . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):5429.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery may allow a shortened period of prone positioning. This study reports the results of macular hole surgery combined with a shortened (3 day) prone position period by a single surgeon (GS). Methods: A retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients (20 eyes) that were treated for a stage II or stage III macular hole by a single surgeon (GS). All patients received a standard three port pars plana vitrectomy, triamcinolone–assisted internal limiting membrane peeling, and gas tamponade with either C3F8 16% or SF6 25%. All patients were instructed to remain in a prone position for 3 days at least 50% of the time. Anatomic closure rates, visual outcomes, and complications were evaluated. Results: The primary endpoint of macular hole closure was achieved in all eyes. Macular holes were classified as stage II in 7/20 eyes and stage III in 13/20 eyes. Demographic data reveal 14/20 (70%) patients were female. The average age was 67 years and the average follow–up period was 14 weeks with range of 4–48 weeks. Vision remained stable or improved in 14/20 (70%). Of the 6 patients with decreased vision, 5 were found to have significant cataract progression. One patient received intraoperative treatment for a retinal tear. Two patients had significant elevations of IOP (>40) on postoperative day 1 that were successfully treated with pressure lowering medications. Conclusions: This study reports that macular hole surgery with ILM peeling and a shortened period of prone positioning achieved anatomical closure and was not associated with significant adverse outcomes.

Keywords: macular holes • vitreoretinal surgery • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×