May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Intraocular Foreign Bodies: Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors in 58 Cases
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P.–V. Jacomet
    Ophthalmology, University of Tours, Tours, France
  • E. Lala–Gitteau
    Ophthalmology, University of Tours, Tours, France
  • S. Arsene
    Ophthalmology, University of Tours, Tours, France
  • P.–J. Pisella
    Ophthalmology, University of Tours, Tours, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P. Jacomet, None; E. Lala–Gitteau, None; S. Arsene, None; P. Pisella, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 5448. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P.–V. Jacomet, E. Lala–Gitteau, S. Arsene, P.–J. Pisella; Intraocular Foreign Bodies: Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors in 58 Cases . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):5448.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To describe outcome in patients with intraocular foreign body (IOFB), documenting initial clinical characteristics and surgical management, in attempt to analyze visual prognostic factors and to classify them according to their importance. Methods: It is a retrospective interventional study of 58 consecutive patients, undergoing surgical removal of IOFB. A multivariate analysis, using a stepwise logistic regression model, allowed determining the influence of clinical and surgical independent variables studied on the best corrected final Visual Acuity (fVA). Results: fVA > 5/10 was obtained in 41 patients (71%) and > 1/10 in 51 patients (88%). The initial visual acuity (iVA) was found to be statistically significant predictor of a fVA > 7/10 (Odd Ratio=6,37, p=0,016). Prognostic factor for a poor outcome (fVA < 1/10) included traumatic cataract (OR=63,42, p=0,104), foreign body’s size (OR=1,454, p=0,97) and delay of its removal (OR=1,108, p=0,012). However cataract is the only one prognostic factor of an improvement of the visual acuity during the evolution (OR=3,21, p=0,048). Conclusions: Thanks to microsurgical progresses and to efficiency of the prevention of endophthalmitis, final visual outcome was excellent in 71% of patients. The more the iVA is high, the more the chances to have an excellent fVA are important. But the more the size of the IOFB and the more the delay of the removal of this one increase, and the more the risk of a poor visual outcome is important. In fact, the anatomical and functional prognosis of IOFB remains difficult to establish at the early clinical examination.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence • trauma • vitreoretinal surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×