May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Behavioral Sensitivity to Defocus in Human Infants
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Wang
    School Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
  • T.R. Candy
    School Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Wang, None; T.R. Candy, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NEI EY014460
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 5607. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Wang, T.R. Candy; Behavioral Sensitivity to Defocus in Human Infants . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):5607.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Young human infants should have a larger sensory depth of focus than adults as a result of their immature contrast sensitivity function (eg. Green, Powers & Banks, 1980). Thus, infants should be less sensitive to optical defocus than adults are. The goal of this study was to estimate infants’ behavioral threshold for defocus in natural images. Methods: Four–month–old full term infants were recruited as subjects. Defocused natural images were computed using OTFs that combine the effects of the subjects’ mean pupil size (mean=4.2mm,SD=0.5mm), the viewing distance, and the desired levels of defocus. Two–alternative forced–choice preferential looking (FPL) was used to determine whether the infants’ could discriminate a focused image from a defocused one. Six levels of defocused images were randomized into a blocked design and an observer judged the infants’ responses by observing the first Purkinje images generated by a light source in the centre of the display. Results: The psychometric functions were fitted to find the 75% correct threshold for defocus. The thresholds for defocus were less than 1.5D. Conclusions: While predictions of blur sensitivity based on infants’ acuity predict performance significantly better than a threshold of 1.5D, it is not possible to direct infants to perform to their true threshold. The results of this study do, however, demonstrate a clear upper bound to their sensitivity that is of significance in clinical decision–making.

Keywords: visual development • infant vision 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×