May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2005
Electronic Monitoring of Occlusion for Amblyopia: Acceptance by Families and Convenience for Users
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Y. Chopovska
    Dept of Ophthalmology, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • L. Pepler
    Dept of Ophthalmology, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • A. Kosowski
    Dept of Ophthalmology, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • M. Lüchtenberg
    Dept of Ophthalmology, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • M. Fronius
    Dept of Ophthalmology, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Y. Chopovska, None; L. Pepler, None; A. Kosowski, None; M. Lüchtenberg, None; M. Fronius, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  M. Fronius: Albert von Metzler Foundation, Edith von Heyden Foundation, Augenstern e. V. Association
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 5706. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Y. Chopovska, L. Pepler, A. Kosowski, M. Lüchtenberg, M. Fronius; Electronic Monitoring of Occlusion for Amblyopia: Acceptance by Families and Convenience for Users . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(13):5706.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To present further experience with the Occlusion Dose Monitors (ODMs, Simonsz et al., 1999) used by ERPAG, including aspects of handling, their acceptance by families of amblyopic patients, and means of improving the ease of operation. Methods: The ODMs (35x15x3.6mm, 2.3g), taped to the outside of the occlusion patch, measure the temperature difference between their front and back surface. By means of a questionnaire about the ODM and its use, data were collected from 17 families of children with repeated short–time use (one week every three months) and 7 families of children in whom compliance was monitored continuously for at least 6 months. ODMs were distributed by home visits every week because of the limited battery capacity. A program for quicker and easier data analysis was developed and tested in comparison to the conventional method. The convenience of the data download from ODM to computer and of data analysis was tested by 20 students, who performed these operations following the instructions of a manual. Results: According to the questionnaire, the acceptance of the ODM by children was good or very good in 79,2%, only two disliked the device. All parents from long–term registration needed less than 2 min for daily ODM handling, while 4 parents with repeated short–time use needed somewhat longer. 50% of parents considered the ODM to be slightly too large, only 20,8% found it slightly too heavy. Correspondence between the occlusion times evaluated conventionally and by the new timesaving software was over 99%. All students judged the data download and evaluation to be easy or very easy. Conclusions: At least among families participating in research projects the acceptance of the ODM was good. Handling improvement, as contributed by our study, and further technical development will enable the use of the ODMs on a larger scale.

Keywords: amblyopia • strabismus • clinical research methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×