May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Interocular–differences In Corneal Asphericity And Aberrations Diminish Binocular Contrast–sensitivity And Binocular Summation After Lasik
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.R. Jimenez
    Optics, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
  • R.G. Anera
    Optics, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
  • L. Jimenez del Barco
    Optics, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
  • R. Gutierrez
    Ophthalmology, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • C. Villa
    Clínica Novovision, Madrid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.R. Jimenez, None; R.G. Anera, None; L. Jimenez del Barco, None; R. Gutierrez, None; C. Villa, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  BFM2003–01492
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 199. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.R. Jimenez, R.G. Anera, L. Jimenez del Barco, R. Gutierrez, C. Villa; Interocular–differences In Corneal Asphericity And Aberrations Diminish Binocular Contrast–sensitivity And Binocular Summation After Lasik . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):199.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To analyze binocular function (binocular contrast–sensitivity function) and the role of interocular differences in corneal asphericity and corneal aberrations after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: Binocular, both monocular CSF (contrast–sensitivity function) and interocular–differences in Q (asphericity) and corneal aberrations were measured pre– and post–surgery in 128 eyes of 64 patients. Binocular summation is calculated as the quotient of the binocular CSF divided by the average of the two monocular CSFs. The CSF test was conducted with the VCTS 6500 for spatial 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 18 cpd. Corneal data were taken with an Eye–Sys 2000 topographer and corneal aberrations data were obtained from the VOL–3D programme. Results: Average binocular summation significantly diminishes (P=0.009) after LASIK for subjects with high interocular–differences in corneal asphericity (Q–difference>0.14) and aberrations. For these subjects (who also show high initial myopia), deterioration in binocular CSF data is higher than found for monocular CSF data. Subjects with low interocular–differences in corneal asphericity (Q–difference<0.14) and aberrations show a non–significant decrease (P=0.12) in binocular summation. Conclusions: The deterioration in binocular function for subjects with high interocular–differences in corneal asphericity and aberrations justify that the new proposals of ablation algorithms include criteria that improve binocular, and not just monocular, visual performance after refractive surgery. One simple practical criterion would be to minimize interocular–differences in Q after LASIK to values lower than 0.1.

Keywords: refractive surgery: LASIK • refractive surgery: corneal topography • contrast sensitivity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×