May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Patient expectations, understanding & outcome as determinants of satisfaction in cataract surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C.K. Pager
    Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • P.J. McCluskey
    Ophthalmology, Central Sydney Area Health Service, Sydney, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C.K. Pager, None; P.J. McCluskey, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 283. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C.K. Pager, P.J. McCluskey; Patient expectations, understanding & outcome as determinants of satisfaction in cataract surgery . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):283.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose:The purpose of this study is, firstly, to document patients’ pre–operative expectations for post–operative outcomes; and secondly, to measure the relative contribution of patient understanding, expectations, outcome, and expectation–outcome disparity in determining patient satisfaction. Methods:121 patients were surveyed just before and one month after surgery regarding their understanding of the procedure, satisfaction with their vision, and both current & expected visual function for each of the items on the VF–14 scale. Results:60% of patients expected to achieve a perfect VF–14 score. The average expected VF–14 score was 96.6, compared against an achieved VF–14 score of just 89.8. The most unrealistic expectations involved driving at night, reading small print and doing fine handiwork. Surprisingly, improvement in visual function was not correlated with satisfaction in vision. While patient understanding, expectations and achieved VF–14 did correlate with satisfaction, when controlling for other factors only achievement–expectation disparity was independently predictive. Conclusions:This study provides support for the expectation–outcome disparity model of patient satisfaction. Further, it highlights the highly unrealistic expectations harbored by cataract patients, and emphasizes the importance for clinicians to control their patients’ expectations. Controlling patient expectations may be more effective than improving patients’ post–operative outcome in terms of maximizing patient satisfaction.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower • cataract 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.