May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Differential responses of human lens epithelial cells to intraocular lenses: hydrophobic acrylic versus PMMA or silicone materials
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N.R. Perdue
    Vascular Biology, The Hope Heart Institute, Seattle, WA
  • E.H. Sage
    Vascular Biology, The Hope Heart Institute, Seattle, WA
  • Q. Yan
    Vascular Biology, The Hope Heart Institute, Seattle, WA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N.R. Perdue, None; E.H. Sage, None; Q. Yan, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  EY14150 and Alcon Grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 360. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N.R. Perdue, E.H. Sage, Q. Yan; Differential responses of human lens epithelial cells to intraocular lenses: hydrophobic acrylic versus PMMA or silicone materials . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):360.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the influence of three types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) on human lens epithelial cell behavior and the expression of extracellular matrix proteins produced by these cells on IOLs in vitro. Methods: Human lens epithelial cells (SRA 01/04, provided by Dr. V. N. Reddy) were grown on SA60AT ACRYSOF®, MZ60BD EXPAND® PMMA, and SI–30NB PHACOFLEX® silicone IOLs. Cellular adhesion, migration, proliferation, and apoptotic assays were performed to assess cell behavior. The expression of extracellular matrix proteins was determined by immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, and metabolic labeling with [3H]–Proline. Results: Cells grown on hydrophobic acrylic lenses had significantly higher proliferation rates in comparison to cells grown on PMMA or silicone IOLs. A confluent monolayer of cells covered the entire anterior surface of the hydrophobic acrylic lenses, but not PMMA or silicone IOLs. More apoptotic cells were present on the PMMA lenses compared to the hydrophobic acrylic lenses. Fibronectin, laminin, and collagens I and IV were produced by cells on all three types of IOLs. Interestingly, there was a decreased production of fibronectin and laminin per cell on the hydrophobic acrylic lens surface compared to the other two types of materials. Cells grown on the hydrophobic acrylic lens also expressed less collagen I compared to cells grown on PMMA or silicone. Conclusions: Lens epithelial cells propagated on the hydrophobic acrylic lenses achieved a confluent monolayer, maintained normal viability and expressed less of some ECM proteins compared to cells grown on other IOL materials. This suggests that hydrophobic acrylic ACRYSOF lenses are more biocompatible than EXPAND PMMA and PHACOFLEX silicone lenses.

Keywords: posterior capsular opacification (PCO) • extracellular matrix • immunohistochemistry 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×