May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Sensory analysis of comfortable physical properties of artificial tear for dry eye–condition
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. Nakamichi
    Research Center, OPHTECS Corporation, Toyooka, Japan
  • T. Nishimura
    Research Center, OPHTECS Corporation, Toyooka, Japan
  • M. Ando
    Research Center, OPHTECS Corporation, Toyooka, Japan
  • S. Nakamura
    Research Center, OPHTECS Corporation, Toyooka, Japan
  • F. Saitoh
    Research Center, OPHTECS Corporation, Toyooka, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T. Nakamichi, None; T. Nishimura, None; M. Ando, None; S. Nakamura, None; F. Saitoh, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 84. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. Nakamichi, T. Nishimura, M. Ando, S. Nakamura, F. Saitoh; Sensory analysis of comfortable physical properties of artificial tear for dry eye–condition . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):84.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: : To investigate relation between physical properties of artificial tear preparations and individual ocular comfort in dry eye condition. Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers (age; 24 to 33) without subjective symptom to ocular health were enrolled for this study. Subjects were provided informed consent. Sensory analysis were performed in the two different controlled environments; 1) living condition without visual tasking, 2) 30min exposed to controlled dry eye environment (temperature; 20–25oC, humidity; 30%RH). Each subject applied one drop of artificial tear formulation with varied physical properties (osmotic pressure; 100, 200, 290, 400, 500 and 600mOsm, pH; 6.0, 7.3 and 8.0) to one eye and commercial artificial eye drop (osmotic pressure was 280mOsm, pH was 7.2) to fellow eye as a control in blind manner. The subjects assessed their individual ocular comfort compare to control preparation according to a 0 (apparently inferior) – 5 (apparently superior) point scale, approximately 10min after application. Results: In controlled dry eye environment, the subjects (43%) were favored artificial tear formulation; whose osmotic pressure was 200mOsm and pH was 7.3, and the subjects (43%) were judged the formulation same as control. In living condition, the subjects (39%) were favored artificial tear formulation; whose osmotic pressure was 290mOsm and pH was 7.3, and the subjects (46%) were judged the formulation same as control. Conclusions: Comfortable physical properties of artificial tear are dependent on eye–conditions.

Keywords: cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×