May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Electro–adhesive tissue manipulator for vitreoretinal surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.S. Blumenkranz
    Ophthalmology, Stanford Univ Med School, Stanford, CA
  • A. Vankov
    Ophthalmology, Stanford Univ Med School, Stanford, CA
  • P. Huie
    Ophthalmology, Stanford Univ Med School, Stanford, CA
  • D. Palanker
    Ophthalmology, Stanford Univ Med School, Stanford, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.S. Blumenkranz, None; A. Vankov, None; P. Huie, None; D. Palanker, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1045. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.S. Blumenkranz, A. Vankov, P. Huie, D. Palanker; Electro–adhesive tissue manipulator for vitreoretinal surgery . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1045.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To develop a more precise and less traumatic device to grasp and lift delicate tissues, such as the internal limited membrane (ILM) during vitreoretinal surgery. We present the concept of electrically–induced adhesion of tissue. Methods: Conductive microprobes of 50 µm in diameter and 0.2–0.6 mm in length were activated by bi–phasic burst waveforms with pulse durations varying in the range of 0.1 – 1 ms. Adhesive forces were measured on chick chorioallantoic membrane using a microdynamometer. The size of the collateral damage zone assessed histologically, and by staining with physiological markers. Results: The microprobe displayed adhesive properties after application of a pulse within the voltage range of 60–200V. Maximal adhesive force per unit length of the probe was about 2 mN/mm (or 0.2 g per mm of length), which is sufficient for any intraocular tissue manipulation. The adhesive force was stable over time with no further electrical pulses required to maintain it. To disconnect the probe from the tissue a single pulse at higher voltage is applied, which creates a few micrometers–thick transient vapor cavity around the electrode. This vapor cavity pushes the captured tissue away from the probe thus releasing it. Propidium iodide staining of the live tissue demonstrates that the collateral damage zone extends no more than 10–20 µm from the probe. Conclusions: Capturing and manipulation of thin and evasive membranes can be performed with electro–adhesive technique in an easier and less traumatic manner than with conventional forceps. This technique may be applicable to various types of ophthalmic microsurgery, including internal limiting membrane and lens capsule dissection.

Keywords: retina • vitreoretinal surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×