May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Vision improvement using customized optics in normal and abnormal eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. Jeong
    Center for Visual Science,
    University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
  • G. Yoon
    Center for Visual Science,
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
  • D.R. Williams
    Center for Visual Science,
    University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
  • I.G. Cox
    Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T. Jeong, None; G. Yoon, Bausch & Lomb F, C; D.R. Williams, Bausch & Lomb F, C, R; I.G. Cox, Bausch & Lomb F, E, C, R.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH/NEI R01 EY014999, NYSTAR/CEIS, Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), Bausch & Lomb
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1078. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. Jeong, G. Yoon, D.R. Williams, I.G. Cox; Vision improvement using customized optics in normal and abnormal eyes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1078.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To psychophysically demonstrate improvements in vision when correcting higher–order aberrations with customized optics in normal and abnormal eyes. Methods: The wavefront aberrations of six eyes, 3 normal and 3 abnormal (1 post–LASIK and 2 keratoconic) eyes, were measured with a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor. Phase plates were designed to correct for the measured wavefront aberrations and were fabricated using a lathing technique. Improvements in visual performance were measured psychophysically using high (100%) and low (10%) contrast tumbling E visual acuity (VA). VAs were compared when only second order aberrations (defocus and astigmatism) were corrected to when all aberrations were corrected with the phase plate. Results: Higher–order rms in the normal and abnormal groups was 0.39 ± 0.07 µm (mean ± standard deviation) and 2.1 ± 1.36 µm for a 6 mm pupil, respectively. In the normal eyes, the phase plate reduced the higher–order rms from 0.39 ± 0.07 to 0.15 ± 0.02 µm for a 6 mm pupil. For the abnormal eyes, the higher–order rms was reduced from 2.1 ± 1.36 to 0.55 ± 0.56 µm with the phase plate for a 6 mm pupil. With the phase plate, the average high contrast VAs were –0.24 ± 0.04 logMAR in normal eyes and –0.17 ± 0.14 logMAR in abnormal eyes. On average, normal eyes experienced a half line of improvement in high contrast VA and one line of improvement in low contrast VA. Abnormal eyes had a 2 line improvement in high contrast VA and a 3 line improvement in low contrast VA. In all eyes, larger visual benefits were achieved in low contrast VA than in high contrast VA. Conclusions: It has been successfully demonstrated that using customized optics to correct higher–order aberrations improves visual performance in normal and abnormal eyes. Higher order aberration corrections can provide substantially larger benefits over conventional corrections, especially in abnormal eyes. This study encourages the development of customized contact lenses as a practical tool for customized vision correction.

Keywords: refraction • keratoconus • contact lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×