May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
An Artificial Neural Network for Forecasting Uveal Melanoma Prognosis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • I. Kaiserman
    Ophthalmology, Hadassah Univesity Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • J. Pe'er
    Ophthalmology, Hadassah Univesity Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  I. Kaiserman, None; J. Pe'er, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1211. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      I. Kaiserman, J. Pe'er; An Artificial Neural Network for Forecasting Uveal Melanoma Prognosis . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1211.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To evaluate the ability of an artificial neural network (ANN) to forecast the 5–year survival of uveal melanoma. Methods:153 eyes with uveal melanoma, (mean age 61 years) treated with Ru–106 brachytherapy between 1988–1998 were followed clinically and ultrasonically every 6.7 ± 0.3 months (mean follow–up 9.6±3.7 years). 3–4 layers backpropagation ANNs (2–16 neurons each) were constructed and trained on 75 patients. The information fed to the ANN included patient’s age, sex and country of birth; tumor’s base size, height, internal reflectivity, regularity, vascularity, extra–scleral extension, location in the eye and the initial post–brachytherapy regression rate. The ANN’s ability to forecast the 5–year survival was tested on a separate group of 78 patients using ROC curves and likelihood ratios (LR). Results:57 patients had small tumors (2–4mm), 66 medium tumors (4–8mm) and 24 large ones (>8 mm). Multivariate Cox regression of all input parameters showed that the most significant prognostic parameter was tumor height followed by tumor regression rate. Large tumors had a 23% 5–year mortality compared with 10% for small tumors. Fast regressing tumors (>0.7mm/month) had 37% 5–year mortality compared to 16% for the slow regressing tumors. The best 3–layers ANN had a diagnostic precision of 84% (LR=31.5) while the best four layers ANN had a diagnostic precision of 82% (LR=15.7). Conclusions:Three layers ANNs have a very good ability to forecast the 5–year mortality from uveal melanoma. Additional layers do not add forecasting accuracy.

Keywords: melanoma 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×