May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Measuring choroidal melanoma basal diameter: using ultrasound vs. a new wide–angle fundus camera
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J.J. Pe'er
    Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • C. Sancho
    Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • J. Cantu
    Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • S. Eilam
    Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • I. Barzel
    Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • M. Shulman
    Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • E.Z. Blumenthal
    Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.J. Pe'er, None; C. Sancho, None; J. Cantu, None; S. Eilam, None; I. Barzel, None; M. Shulman, None; E.Z. Blumenthal, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1223. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J.J. Pe'er, C. Sancho, J. Cantu, S. Eilam, I. Barzel, M. Shulman, E.Z. Blumenthal; Measuring choroidal melanoma basal diameter: using ultrasound vs. a new wide–angle fundus camera . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1223.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Largest basal diameter of choroidal melanoma is considered to be a significant clinical prognostic parameter, and is important in planning treatment of these tumors. The purpose of this study is to compare the measurements of the basal diameter by ultrasound to those obtained using a new wide–angle fundus camera. Methods: The basal diameter of 61 new and treated choroidal melanomas were measured by B–scan ultrasound and by a wide–angle fundus camera (Panoret–1000, Medibell Medical Vision Technologies, Haifa, Israel). The maximal diameter of each recognized elevated tumor was measured using ultrasound, while with the fundus camera the maximal diameter of the pigmented tumor was measured. The comparison was performed using summary statistics and paired t–test. Results: The mean long diameter was 10.66 ± 4.15 mm by Panoret–1000, and 9.48 ± 2.90 mm by ultrasound. The mean short diameter was 8.58 ± 3.25 mm by Panoret–1000 and 8.20 ± 2.50 mm by ultrasound. The Panoret–1000 measurements, on average, were 1.20 ± 3.55 mm longer for the long diameter and 0.40 ± 2.80 mm longer for the short diameter. These differences are both highly statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Assessment of basal diameter of uveal melanomas differs according to whether ultrasound or wide–angle fundus photography is used, favoring larger measurements with the fundus photography. We attribute this difference to the larger extent of the lesion's pigmentation than its elevation.

Keywords: melanoma • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • oncology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×