May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Intense Light– and Time–Dependent Changes in Rat Rod Outer Segment Crystallins
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D.T. Organisciak
    Petticrew Research Laboratory, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
  • K.M. Henkels
    Petticrew Research Laboratory, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
  • K. West
    Cole Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmic Research, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • J. Sun
    Cole Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmic Research, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • J.W. Crabb
    Cole Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmic Research, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • R.M. Darrow
    Petticrew Research Laboratory, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.T. Organisciak, None; K.M. Henkels, None; K. West, None; J. Sun, None; J.W. Crabb, None; R.M. Darrow, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grants EY01959, EY06603, EY014239 and M. Petticrew
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 733. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D.T. Organisciak, K.M. Henkels, K. West, J. Sun, J.W. Crabb, R.M. Darrow; Intense Light– and Time–Dependent Changes in Rat Rod Outer Segment Crystallins . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):733.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To determine the presence and expression levels of crystallins in rat retinal ROS samples at various times of the day and night and in response to intense visible light. Methods: Weanling male Sprague–Dawley rats were reared in either dim cyclic light or in darkness. At P 60, animals were dark–adapted for 16 hours and then either exposed to intense visible light at 0100, 0900 or 1700 or not. Light treatments were for 0.5, 3 or 8 hour durations. ROS were isolated from 8 light–exposed or unexposed animals for each time point. ROS proteins were visualized on 2D–gels, and α, ß and γ crystallins were identified by western analysis with individual or class specific antibodies. Individual crystallins and other ROS proteins were excised from gels, digested in situ with trypsin and identified by capillary LC MS/MS. Results: In unexposed rat ROS, αA and αB crystallins were readily detected at 0100, 0900 and 1700, while ß and γ crystallins were less prevalent. Upon exposure to intense light, changes in ROS crystallins were found to depend on the duration of exposure and time of day of light treatment. Mass spectrometric analyses of excised gel spots have revealed a partial 2D proteomic footprint of rat ROS. Conclusions: Crystallins are present in rat ROS and exhibit expression patterns which vary by time of day and intense light exposure. Our data suggests that intense light–induced photoreceptor cell degeneration leads to changes in ROS crystallin proteins and/or post–translational processing which appears to correlate with the duration of light exposure. CR: None. Support: NIH EY–01959 & M. Petticrew, Springfield, OH (DTO); NIH EY06603 and EY014239 (JWC).

Keywords: crystallins • photoreceptors • proteomics 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×