May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Correlation between central corneal thickness, scleral thickness and refractive error
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Oliveira
    Glaucoma/Ophthalmology, NY Eye & Ear Inf, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
  • C. Tello
    Glaucoma/Ophthalmology, NY Eye & Ear Inf, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
  • R. Ritch
    Glaucoma/Ophthalmology, NY Eye & Ear Inf, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
  • J.M. Liebmann
    Ophthalmology, New York University, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Oliveira, None; C. Tello, None; R. Ritch, None; J.M. Liebmann, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 963. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Oliveira, C. Tello, R. Ritch, J.M. Liebmann; Correlation between central corneal thickness, scleral thickness and refractive error . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):963.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To verify the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and scleral thickness and to assess possible correlation between CCT, scleral thickness, refractive error and axial length. Methods: Ninety eyes of 90 consecutive patients without previous history of intraocular surgery were studied prospectively. CCT, axial length and scleral thickness were measured ultrasonically using pachymetry, A–scan and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), respectively. The first two measurements were performed in the center of the cornea and the third on the temporal meridian of the eye at the scleral spur and at 2 and 3 mm posterior to it by one observer (CO). UBM measurements were independently obtained by the two observers (CT and CO), and both were masked to the data. The patients were allocated into groups according to spherical equivalent. Results: Mean age of the patients was 55.04 ± 15.11 years. Mean refractive error expressed as spherical equivalent was – 1.41 ± 4.85 diopters. Interobserver reproducibility was good, with CV of 3.1%, 4.9% and 5.1 % for scleral thickness at the scleral spur and at 2 and 3 mm posterior to it, respectively. There was a positive correlation between CCT and scleral thickness only at the scleral spur (r = 0.23, P = 0.028 for CT; r = 0.020, P = 0.047 for CO). CCT and scleral thickness did not correlate significantly with refractive error (P> 0.05), although there was a tendency for decreasing corneal thickness with increasing myopia. Nevertheless, an increasing myopic refractive error strongly correlated with an increasing axial length (r = –0.86, P< 0.0001). Conclusion: CCT correlates positively with scleral thickness only at the scleral spur. On the other hand, CCT and scleral thickness do not correlate with refractive error.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • sclera 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×