May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Quality of Life and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Keratoconus – Results From the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S.M. Kymes
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
  • B.S. Wilson
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
  • M.O. Gordon
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
  • CLEK Study Group
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.M. Kymes, None; B.S. Wilson, None; M.O. Gordon, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1376. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S.M. Kymes, B.S. Wilson, M.O. Gordon, CLEK Study Group; Quality of Life and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Keratoconus – Results From the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1376.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: We report the impact of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) on vision–related quality of life in a prospective cohort of patients with keratoconus. Methods: Our sample consisted of patients in the CLEK study who underwent their first PK during follow–up and completed the NEI–VFQ (VFQ). CLEK patients completed the VFQ at their first annual follow–up visit and annually thereafter. VFQ scores at this Year 1 visit were used as baseline. We compared the PK group to the baseline scores of patients who did not undergo PK (non–PK). Scores prior to PK and the two visits after PK are reported for the first eye undergoing the surgery. For patients subsequently undergoing PK in the fellow eye (resulting in bilateral PK), we report VFQ scores from the final CLEK visit. Results: The VFQ was administered to 1,166 CLEK patients at the Year 1 follow–up visit. One hundred eighteen CLEK patients underwent PK through Year 7. The VFQ was not available at CLEK enrollment, thus only 75 of these 118 patients completed the VFQ prior to PK. Of the 118, 117 completed the VFQ at the first annual visit after PK and 92 at the second. At the annual CLEK visit prior to PK, patients had significantly lower scores than the non–PK group on all scales. Patients had significant improvement on 2 of 12 scales at the first post–PK visit, but remained significantly lower than the non–PK group on all scales. Significant improvement was reported on 10 of 12 scales at the second CLEK visit post–PK, but remained significantly below the non–PK group on 6 of 12 scales. Patients with bilateral PK had scores comparable to, or higher, than the non–PK group on 11 of 12 scales at their final CLEK visit, but scores remained below an age–similar group of rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens wearers on all but one scale. Conclusions: We found that both unilateral and bilateral post–PK patients have impaired vision–related quality of life when compared to RGP wearers of similar age . There is a need for a better understanding of the impairments in quality of life that are associated with keratoconus and the role of PK in its management.  

Keywords: keratoconus • quality of life • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×