May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Low Vision Rehabilitation: An Investigation of Psychological Characteristics
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L. Dreer
    Ophthalmology,
    University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • D.C. Fletcher
    Ophthalmology,
    University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • T. Elliott
    Psychology,
    University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L. Dreer, None; D.C. Fletcher, None; T. Elliott, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1380. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L. Dreer, D.C. Fletcher, T. Elliott; Low Vision Rehabilitation: An Investigation of Psychological Characteristics . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1380.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Introduction:Changes in lifestyle and quality of life issues associated with low vision problems may be quite distressing on an individual’s emotional functioning (Pollard, 2000). However, research on the psychosocial issues and characteristics of individuals coping with low vision problems remains poorly understood. Purpose:The present study addressed this problem by examining descriptive information related to the psychological aspects of coping with low vision changes. Methods:Parrticipant Characteristics The sample included 19 male (52.8%) and 17 female (47.2%) low vision patients. Age of participants ranged from 20 to 92 years old (M = 70.86, SD = 16.84). Measures A total of 7 visual analogue scales (VASs) were used to measure perceptions of psychological reactions (anger, depression, fear, anxiety, frustration) and cognitive appraisals (intolerance and interference). Higher scores on each scale indicate greater interference, less ability to tolerate, greater depression, anxiety, frustration, anger, and/or fear. A total distress score can also be obtained. Results:Age was negatively associated with anger and overall distress. Younger age was associated with greater anger (r = –.45, p < .01) and for experiencing overall distress (r = –.36, p < .03). Interestingly, no other significant correlations between age or gender and emotional reactions (fear, anxiety, depression, and overall emotional distress were noted) were found. A multiple regression was conducted to predict emotional distress with demographic variables (age and gender) and variables associated with vision (total # of vision related problems identified, persistence on a difficult vision test in seconds, and visual acuity) and cognitive appraisals (interference and intolerance). Interestingly, interference and intolerance significantly accounted for 24% of the overall distress variance over and above demographic variables and variables associated with vision. Thus, these two cognitive appraisals are better predictors of emotional distress than visual acuity and persistence during a complex visual test or demographic information. Conclusion:The current findings highlight the need for understanding psychological factors of individuals coping with low vision problems. Implications for integrating psychology into low vision rehabilitation will be discussed.

Keywords: low vision • aging • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×