May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
The effect of optical defocus on the test–retest variability of visual acuity measurements
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Rosser
    Epidemiology/Int Eye Hlth, Institute Ophthalmology UCL, London, United Kingdom
  • I. Murdoch
    Epidemiology/Int Eye Hlth, Institute Ophthalmology UCL, London, United Kingdom
  • S. Cousens
    London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Rosser, None; I. Murdoch, None; S. Cousens, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  MURI 1011
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1386. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Rosser, I. Murdoch, S. Cousens; The effect of optical defocus on the test–retest variability of visual acuity measurements . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1386.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the effect of optical defocus upon the test–retest variability (TRV) of visual acuity measurements in normal subjects. Methods: Normal subjects underwent repeated visual acuity measurement with optical defocus of zero, 0.50, and 1.00 dioptres (D). All measurements were taken using the ETDRS version of the Bailey–Lovie logMAR chart. TRV was quantified in terms of its 95% range, both empirically and using the approach of Bland and Altman. Results: Using the Bland and Altman approach, the estimated 95% TRV ranges were ±0.11 logMAR for zero defocus, ±0.18 logMAR for 0.50D defocus, and ±0.25 for 1.00D defocus. Conclusions: Optical defocus has a considerable effect upon the TRV of visual acuity measurements. These findings have important implications for both clinical practice and clinical research. Uncorrected refractive errors as small as 0.50D may compromise the detection of visual change in individuals, and contribute to unnecessarily large sample sizes in clinical trials which employ visual acuity as a primary outcome measure.

Keywords: visual acuity • clinical research methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×