May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
THE EFFECT OF FDA APPROVED SOFT CONTACT LENS LUBRICANTS ON CONTRAST SENSITIVITY.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • W.H. Ridder
    Basic & Visual Science, Southern CA Coll of Optometry, Fullerton, CA
  • J.O. LaMotte
    Basic & Visual Science, Southern CA Coll of Optometry, Fullerton, CA
  • J. Fermin
    Basic & Visual Science, Southern CA Coll of Optometry, Fullerton, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  W.H. Ridder, None; J.O. LaMotte, None; J. Fermin, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1565. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      W.H. Ridder, J.O. LaMotte, J. Fermin; THE EFFECT OF FDA APPROVED SOFT CONTACT LENS LUBRICANTS ON CONTRAST SENSITIVITY. . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1565.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Artificial tears when applied to the tear film alter its structure and may affect contrast sensitivity. Previous studies indicated that Liquigel and Celluvisc (not FDA approved for use with a contact lens) decreased contrast sensitivity in contact lens wearers. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the addition of FDA approved contact lens lubricants to the tear film affects contrast sensitivity over time. Furthermore, different tear formulations were investigated to determine if one formulation was best. Methods: Eight normal CL–wearing subjects took part in this project. Clerz 2 (Alcon), Focus Lens Drops (CIBA Vision), and Sensitive Eyes Drops (B&L) were investigated. The stimulus, viewed monocularly, was a stationary, vertically oriented, sine wave grating (14 cpd). A temporal, two–alternative, forced–choice paradigm combined with a self–paced method of limits was employed to monitor the threshold over time. After baseline data collection, a drop of the lubricant was applied to the tear film and the procedure continued for 30 minutes. This allowed continual tracking of the threshold for this period. Results: A significant decrease in contrast sensitivity occurred after the application of each of the lubricants (paired T–test, all P values < 0.05). There was no difference in the magnitude of the decrease in sensitivity between the three lubricants (all values P > 0.05). The duration of the decrease in sensitivity was not significantly different among the three lubricants tested (all P values > 0.05). Conclusions: The results indicate that there was no significant difference in the decrease in contrast sensitivity in either duration or magnitude among the contact lens lubricants tested. This was despite differences in formulations in the three lubricants. Clerz 2 contains a viscosity enhancer and a surfactant, Focus Lens Drops contains a surfactant and Sensitive Eye Drops contains neither. Thus, visual performance should not be a factor in the choice of any of these three contact lens lubricants.

Keywords: cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye • cornea: clinical science • contrast sensitivity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×