May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Role of 3–O–Sulfated Heparan Sulfate in Herpes Simplex Virus Type–1 Entry and Spread
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Shukla
    Ophthalmology/Visual Sciences and Microbiology/Immunology, Univ Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • V. Tiwari
    Ophthalmology/Visual Sciences and Microbiology/Immunology, Univ Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • C. Clement
    Ophthalmology/Visual Sciences and Microbiology/Immunology, Univ Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • P.M. Scanlan
    Ophthalmology/Visual Sciences and Microbiology/Immunology, Univ Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • J. Liu
    Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Shukla, None; V. Tiwari, None; C. Clement, None; P.M. Scanlan, None; J. Liu, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  1K22 AI053836 (DS)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1647. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Shukla, V. Tiwari, C. Clement, P.M. Scanlan, J. Liu; Role of 3–O–Sulfated Heparan Sulfate in Herpes Simplex Virus Type–1 Entry and Spread . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1647.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of various 3–O–sulfated forms of heparan sulfate (HS) on herpes simplex virus (HSV–1 and HSV–2) entry and spread. Methods: Recombinant ß–galactosidase–expressing HSV–1 and HSV–2 virions were used for assaying viral entry. A virus–free cell fusion assay was used for comparing the cell–to–cell fusion efficiency of various 3–O–sulfated HS. An enzyme–linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to detect HS expression on cell surface. Results: Chinese hamster ovary–K1 (CHO–K1) cells expressing 3–O–sulfotransferase–3A (3–OST–3A) or 3–OST–5 were susceptible to HSV–1, but not HSV–2, entry, while 3–OST–1 expression did not facilitate entry of either HSV–1 or HSV–2. Similarly, 3–OST–3A or 3–OST–5, but not 3–OST–1, expression in CHO–K1 cells supported cell–to–cell fusion when mixed and co–cultivated with cells expressing HSV–1 glycoproteins. The cell fusion mediated by 3–OST–3A or –5 exhibited similar requirements but was independent of protein receptors, HVEM or Nectin–1. Additionally, co–expression of 3–OST–3A and 3–OST–5 significantly enhanced HSV–1 entry and cell–to–cell fusion without any detectable increase in total cell surface HS. Conclusions:Our findings indicate that entry and fusion receptors generated by 3–O–sulfation of HS are specific for HSV–1. It was also found that not all 3–O–sulfations of HS result in receptors for HSV–1 entry and cell fusion; and receptors generated by 3–OST–3A and 3–OST–5 are likely to differ in structure.

Keywords: herpes simplex virus • glycoconjugates/glycoproteins • keratitis 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×