May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Higher–order aberrations and contrast sensitivity in normal, cataractous, and pseudophakic eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Okamoto
    Dept Ophthalmology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • N. Yamane
    Dept Ophthalmology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • K. Kawana
    Dept Ophthalmology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • F. Okamoto
    Dept Ophthalmology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • T. Oshika
    Dept Ophthalmology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Okamoto, None; N. Yamane, None; K. Kawana, None; F. Okamoto, None; T. Oshika, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1750. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Okamoto, N. Yamane, K. Kawana, F. Okamoto, T. Oshika; Higher–order aberrations and contrast sensitivity in normal, cataractous, and pseudophakic eyes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1750.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate contrast sensitivity function and higher–order wavefront aberrations in eyes undergoing cataract surgery, and to compare pseudophakic eyes and normal controls. Methods: Subjects were 18 eyes with cataract that were undergoing cataract surgery, 108 pseudophakic eyes, and 200 normal eyes. We examined higher–order aberrations for a 4–mm pupil using the wavefront analyzer (Topcon KR–9000PW), contrast sensitivity with CSV–1000E (Vector Vision), low contrast visual acuity with CSV–1000LanC10%, and letter contrast sensitivity with CSV–1000LV. From the data of CSV–1000E, the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) was calculated. Eyes with cataract (18 eyes) were evaluated before and 1 month after surgery. Results: In 18 eyes with cataract, surgery significantly improved all contrast sensitivity parameters (p< 0.0001, Paired t–test), and decreased higher–order aberrations including coma–like, spherical–like, and total aberrations (p< 0.05, Wilcoxon signed–ranks test). When 108 pseudophakic eyes and 200 normal eyes were compared, higher–order aberrations were significantly higher in the IOL group than in the normal controls (p<0.0001, Unpaired t–test), and contrast sensitivity function was significantly worse in the pseudophakic eyes (p<0.0001, Unpaired t–test). In the IOL group, ocular spherical–like aberrations and Zernike C4,0 term exhibited statistically significant correlations with letter contrast sensitivity (r= –0.200, p<0.05, and r= –0.210, p<0.05, Pearson’s correlation), but corneal higher–order aberrations showed no correlation with contrast sensitivity parameters. Conclusions: Cataract surgery improved contrast sensitivity and decreased ocular higher–order aberrations. However, the ocular higher–order aberrations and the contrast sensitivity function in eyes with IOL did not attain the normal level. In pseudophakic eyes, ocular spherical aberration significantly correlated with the reduction in letter contrast sensitivity.

Keywords: contrast sensitivity • imaging/image analysis: clinical • cataract 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×