May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in a family with a mutation in ELOVL4
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • I.M. MacDonald
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Univ Alberta Ocular Res Lab, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • S.J. Flynn
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Univ Alberta Ocular Res Lab, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • T.K. M. Lee
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Univ Alberta Ocular Res Lab, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • R.B. Yau
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Univ Alberta Ocular Res Lab, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • J. Jumpsen
    Dept of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • M. Suh
    Dept of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • M.T. Clandinin
    Dept of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • M. Hebert
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Laval University/Pavillon CHUL, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  I.M. MacDonald, None; S.J. Flynn, None; T.K.M. Lee, None; R.B. Yau, None; J. Jumpsen, None; M. Suh, None; M.T. Clandinin, None; M. Hebert, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  MSI Foundation, Royal Alexandra Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1768. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      I.M. MacDonald, S.J. Flynn, T.K. M. Lee, R.B. Yau, J. Jumpsen, M. Suh, M.T. Clandinin, M. Hebert; Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in a family with a mutation in ELOVL4 . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1768.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To test the effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation on retinal function in patients with a mutation in ELOVL4 Methods: A non–random, unmasked trial of DHA supplementation was conducted in 7 patients from 1 family with autosomal dominant Stargardt–like macular dystrophy and a mutation in ELOVL4. Each patient was provided with a supplement of DHA (20mg/kg/day). Primary outcomes of the trial were: VF14 score, Snellen visual acuity, and the foveal and parafoveal responses of the (61 hexagons) multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Nutritional surveys were completed and serum plasma DHA was measured to monitor compliance at each visit. Results: Seven subjects received DHA over 3 months and six subjects received a further 3 months of DHA supplementation. A threefold increase in serum DHA was measured. Five of the seven patients reported a subjective improvement in vision as measured by the VF14 score. The average responses of the mfERG from both eyes, from the fovea (0–5 degrees) and parafoveal (5–10 degrees) regions, improved in four patients, showed no change in one and declined in two. There was, however, no consistent change in the VF14 score or visual acuity in response to supplementation. The average P1 amplitude change of the mfERG from the fovea and parafovea after supplementation was not significant. Conclusions: Given the improvements found in some of the patients, a large cohort in a masked, randomized, controlled trial is necessary to determine if DHA supplementation can truly alter macular function in these patients.

Keywords: electroretinography: clinical • nutritional factors • retinal degenerations: hereditary 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×