May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Rheology of Vitreous : Effects of Enzymes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. Sakuma
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard medical school, Boston, MA
  • Y.–Y. Won
    School of Chemical Engineering,Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
  • J. Sueda
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard medical school, Boston, MA
  • N. Usumoto
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard medical school, Boston, MA
  • D.A. Weitz
    Department of Physics and DEAS, Harvard university, Boston, MA
  • T. Hirose
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard medical school, Boston, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T. Sakuma, None; Y. Won, None; J. Sueda, None; N. Usumoto, None; D.A. Weitz, None; T. Hirose, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1948. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. Sakuma, Y.–Y. Won, J. Sueda, N. Usumoto, D.A. Weitz, T. Hirose; Rheology of Vitreous : Effects of Enzymes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1948.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To study the rheology of the vitreous after incubation with enzyme to establish a method to evaluate liquefaction quantitatively. Methods: We used bulk rheology to determine how viscoelastic properties of the vitreous body in bovine eyes are affected by enzymes. The rheologic properties of the pristine vitreous and those treated with three enzymes (testicular hyaluronidase [HA], chondrotinase ABC [CA], and collagenase [CO]) were examined using a strain–controlled fluid rheometer. To evaluate the elastic and viscous moduli of the vitreous (G’ and G", respectively), the stress state of vitreous loaded into a gap between parallel plates was measured under applied oscillatory strain as functions of frequency (w). We also measured the vitreous gel weight to determine weight loss associated with enzyme digestion. Results: In all cases, the vitreous was predominantly elastic; G’ is only slightly dependent on w and much greater than G" overall measurement frequencies, confirming the space–filling interconnectivity of the collagen fibers. HA (100 and 500 U/gel) and CA (0.2 and 0.4 U/gel) treatment showed negligible viscoelasticity changes. CO digestion (300 U/gel) caused considerable reduction of elasticity, e.g., G’ decreased by a factor of 2 at 1 rad/s. There was a difference in rheologic effects between CO and the other enzymes, consistent with the different enzymatic activities: CO reacted with type II collagen, whereas HA and CA degraded only network junctions. Digestion with HA (to 72.30% of original wet weight vs 89.88% for controls incubated with buffer, 100 U/gel; 70.31% vs 89.88%, 500 U/gel) and CA (84.71% vs 93.85%, 0.2 U/gel; 82.82% vs 93.85%, 0.4 U/gel) resulted in significant weight decreases resulting from network loss caused by enzymatic degradation of the network junctions. However, CO digestion caused only a slight decrease in gel wet weight (90.70% vs 93.85%, 300 U/gel), despite affecting vitreous elasticity more than the other enzymes. Conclusions: Enzymatic liquefaction of the vitreous body is related to changes in the gel structure and viscoelasticity. Effective liquefaction can be achieved by breakdown in the collagen fiber structures rather than hyaluronan and chondrotinin sulfate.

Keywords: vitreous • vitreoretinal surgery • enzymes/enzyme inhibitors 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.