May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Visual outcomes after different surgical techniques in eyes undergoing macular hole repair.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Ahdoot
    Ophthalmology, North Shore University Hospital, Great Neck, NY
  • V.A. Deramo
    Long Island Vitreoretinal Consultants, PC, Long Island, NY
  • D.M. Fastenberg
    Long Island Vitreoretinal Consultants, PC, Long Island, NY
  • S.A. Harrison
    Long Island Vitreoretinal Consultants, PC, Long Island, NY
  • P.J. Ferrone
    Long Island Vitreoretinal Consultants, PC, Long Island, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Ahdoot, None; V.A. Deramo, None; D.M. Fastenberg, None; S.A. Harrison, None; P.J. Ferrone, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1955. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Ahdoot, V.A. Deramo, D.M. Fastenberg, S.A. Harrison, P.J. Ferrone; Visual outcomes after different surgical techniques in eyes undergoing macular hole repair. . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1955.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To examine visual outcomes using different surgical techniques in macular hole surgery, including internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and staining with indocyanine green (ICG) dye. Methods: Retrospective review of 79 consecutive patients undergoing macular hole repair over a 27 month period. All cases underwent pars plana vitrectomy with removal of the posterior hyaloid. 83 eyes were divided into 3 groups – Group 1 (n=24): no ILM peeling; Group 2 (n=20): ILM peeled without the prior instillation of ICG; Group 3 (n=39): ILM peeled with prior instillation of ICG. Results: The average change in visual acuity was an improvement of 3.7 lines in Group 1, 4.3 lines in Group 2, and 2.9 lines in Group 3 (p = 0.18). The percentage of eyes with improvement in visual acuity > 2 lines was 75%, 90% and 69% for Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The hole closure rate was 96% for Group 1, 95% for Group 2 and 100% for Group 3. Conclusions: All 3 techniques were associated with good hole closure rates and lead to visual improvement in the majority of cases. ILM peeling alone (Group 2) was not harmful to final visual outcome, with results similar to no peeling (Group 1). The use of ICG (Group 3) may have had a less beneficial effect on visual outcome. A larger proportion of patients in Group 3, however, presented with difficult or atypical cases, which may partly account for their lower rate of improvement. Additional patients in all groups will be studied.

Keywords: macular holes 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×