May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
MORE SENSITIVE LINE TEST AS ALTERNATIVE TO WATZKE–ALLEN SLIT– BEAM IN PATIENTS AFTER ANATOMICALLY SUCCESSFUL CLOSURE OF IDIOPATHIC MACULAR HOLE
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.A. Kapusta
    Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, PQ, Canada
  • W. Wittich
    Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, PQ, Canada
  • O. Overbury
    Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, PQ, Canada
    Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, PQ, Canada
  • J. Faubert
    School of Optometry, University of Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.A. Kapusta, None; W. Wittich, None; O. Overbury, None; J. Faubert, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1968. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.A. Kapusta, W. Wittich, O. Overbury, J. Faubert; MORE SENSITIVE LINE TEST AS ALTERNATIVE TO WATZKE–ALLEN SLIT– BEAM IN PATIENTS AFTER ANATOMICALLY SUCCESSFUL CLOSURE OF IDIOPATHIC MACULAR HOLE . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1968.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Traditionally, the Watzke–Allen Slit–Beam Test is used as a diagnostic tool for the detection of macular holes and to assess function after anatomically successful closure of the hole. Thusfar, the psychophysical parameters of this test are not well established. The present study introduces a more sensitive alternative line–test. Methods: Twelve patients (age 58–79, VA 20/40 to 20/130.) who had undergone anatomically successful macular hole surgery within the last five years were tested. The Watzke–Allen Slit–Beam test was performed as part of their follow–up exam. They were then shown a new Hyperacuity Line Test, displayed on a computer screen. A vertical line (3° in length, 1° in width), composed of a white centre with black borders (full contrast, sinusoidal transitions) was shown on a grey background (overall isoluminant display). Each trial consisted of two consecutively presented lines, shown in rapid succession for 100 msec each with a 600 msec interval. One line of each pair was a straight line while the other was distorted into a sinusoidal wave, creating a spatial frequency of 16 cpd. Their order was randomized and repeated 40 times. After each pair, patients were asked which of the lines appeared straight and which wavy. If the patient identified the lines correctly, the amplitude of the sine wave decreased, establishing their hyperacuity threshold. Results: All patients had a negative Watzke–Allen sign. Nonetheless, 33% (4/12) of patients (VA 20/40 to 20/130) perceived a clear break in the Hyperacuity Line display. Conclusions: A post–operative negative Watzke–Allen sign was contradicted by the Hyperacuity Line test in a third of patients with anatomically successful macular hole surgery. This new line test forms a practical and more sensitive addition to the assessment of retinal function after surgery. New parameters for a definition of functional success will be discussed.

Keywords: macular holes • vitreoretinal surgery • macula/fovea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×