May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
STRUCTURAL COMPARISON OF WRINKLING IN EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES AND CHOROIDAL FOLDS: A MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C.M. C. Klais
    Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, NY
  • M.D. Ober
    Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, NY
  • L.V. Del Priore
    Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, NY
    Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C.M.C. Klais, None; M.D. Ober, None; L.V. Del Priore, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by the Macula Foundation, Robert L. Burch III Fund, and Research to Prevent Blindness.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1988. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C.M. C. Klais, M.D. Ober, L.V. Del Priore; STRUCTURAL COMPARISON OF WRINKLING IN EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES AND CHOROIDAL FOLDS: A MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1988.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Epiretinal membranes and choroidal folds are examples of sheer–induced wrinkling of biological tissue under tangential stress. In principle, wrinkling of such thin elastic sheets is governed by physical principles that reflect the properties of the underlying biological tissue. Herein we measure the wrinkling patterns induced in the neural retina and underlying choroid by epiretinal membranes and choroidal folds respectively and demonstrate that the wrinkling patterns reflect the physical properties of the underlying tissue. Methods:32 eyes with epiretinal membranes (group A age < 55 years; 38.4 + 9.8 years, range = 16 to 54 years; group B ≥ 55; 67.7 + 5.3 years, range = 61 to 81 years) and 8 eyes with choroidal folds were included. We determined the average peak–to–peak distance between adjacent folds and its regular periodicity from red–free photographs analyzed with IMAGEnet and Adobe Photoshop software. Results: The average peak–to–peak spacing was significantly larger for choroidal folds versus retinal folds caused by epiretinal membranes (278.2 + 62.2 vs. 81.9 + 12.2 microns; respectively; p = 0.0001) and there was very little variation in this parameter within each group (standard deviation < 8.6 %). The average fold–to–fold distance was independent of the distance of the epicenter of the epiretinal membrane from the fovea. There was no difference in the peak–to–peak spacing between patients within group A versus B (80.1 + 6.9 vs. 80.9 + 3.8 microns; respectively; p = 0.69), and there was no statistically significant correlation with patient age (p=0.25). The peak–to–peak spacing was independent of the cause of the epiretinal membrane. Conclusions: Both epiretinal membranes and choroidal folds represent wrinkling of the underlying tissue which occurs with striking regularity (spacing variation < 8.6%) and periodicity. There is a significant difference in the periodicity of retinal versus choroidal wrinkling, which reflects differences in the elasticity of the underlying tissue. Interestingly the elasticity of the retina does not change over the age range tested, although the age range of patients with choroidal folds was too narrow to allow conclusions to be drawn about the age–related changes in mechanical properties of this tissue.

Keywords: retina • choroid • aging 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×