May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Visual Outcomes following Pars Plan Vitrectomy for Complications of Radiation Retinopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M.O. Peracha
    Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • M.S. Benz
    Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • W.F. Mieler
    Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • E.R. Holz
    Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
  • T.G. Murray
    Ophthalmology – University of Miami, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • S. Couvillion
    Ophthalmology – University of Miami, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.O. Peracha, None; M.S. Benz, None; W.F. Mieler, None; E.R. Holz, None; T.G. Murray, None; S. Couvillion, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 1996. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M.O. Peracha, M.S. Benz, W.F. Mieler, E.R. Holz, T.G. Murray, S. Couvillion; Visual Outcomes following Pars Plan Vitrectomy for Complications of Radiation Retinopathy . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):1996.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcomes in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) surgery for complications of radiation retinopathy. Background: Radiation delivered to the eye or adjacent structures can lead to radiation retinopathy, which can manifest a variety of features resembling diabetic retinopathy. Persistent vitreous hemorrhage (VH) occasionally leads to the need for PPV surgery. There is limited information describing visual outcomes following PPV for complications related to radiation retinopathy. Methods: Retrospective chart review of six patients who underwent PPV for complications of radiation retinopathy. Results: Six eyes (six patients) with history of previous ocular or periocular radiation (5 with external beam and 1 with gamma knife) developed complications requiring PPV surgery. The average age was 33 years(range 6 to 48 years). Five patients required PPV for non–clearing VH and one patient for preretinal hemorrhage and tractional membranes. The preoperative visual acuity (VA) ranged from 20/300 to HM. Five of the six patients were followed in excess of one year (range 3 to 24 months; average 14.5 months). The final VA ranged from 20/80 to HM, with only one patient having VA better than 20/200 (though this patient also received hyperbaric oxygen therapy for persistent macular edema). The reasons for decreased vision postoperatively included macular non–perfusion (4 patients), persistent macular edema (1 patient), and recurrent VH (1 patient). Conclusions: Radiation retinopathy is a well known complication of radiation treatment delivered to the eye or adjacent structures. Our study suggests that patients undergoing PPV for complications of radiation retinopathy appear to have limited visual recovery after the surgery. Patients should be advised of guarded visual prognosis following surgery.

Keywords: vitreoretinal surgery • radiation therapy • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×