May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Is it necessary to restrict shaving and tooth–brushing after retinal detachment surgery?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H. Kobayashi
    Department of Ophthalmology, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan
  • H. Kita
    Department of Advanced Systems Control Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saga University, Saga, Japan
  • M. Nakamura
    Department of Advanced Systems Control Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saga University, Saga, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H. Kobayashi, None; H. Kita, None; M. Nakamura, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 2051. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H. Kobayashi, H. Kita, M. Nakamura; Is it necessary to restrict shaving and tooth–brushing after retinal detachment surgery? . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):2051.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: How to restrict routine activiites, including brushing teeth and shaving, after retinal detachment surgery is controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess effects on eyes by shaving and brushing teeth and to compare with other routine activities. Methods: Ocular vibration and acceleration of healthy volunteers by elecric and manual shaving and tooth–brushing were measured using electro–oculography (EOG) and accelerometer, respectively. The digital data of the EOG and accelerometry time series were transformed into the Fourier components by the FFT method to obtain power spectrum at the range between 0 and 500 Hz. The control activities were breathing, coughing, speaking, eating soft food and eating hard food. Elecric shaver with frequency of 130 Hz and elecric tooth–brush with rotation of 39 Hz were used. Results: The sum of area of power spectrum of EOG (vertical direction) and accelerometry (x–axis) on 0 to 500 Hz was 10008.4 (µV)2 and 0.007808 (m/s2)2 in elecric shaving, 5898.3(µV)2 and 0.016261 (m/s2)2 in manual shaving, 16144.4 (µV)2 and 0.0087811(m/s2)2 in elecric brushing, and 11112.5 (µV)2 and 2.53932 (m/s2)2 in manual brushing, respectively. Elecric and manual tooth–brushing was greater compared with coughing, eating soft and hard food, whereas elecric and manual shaving was less. Similar findings were found in EOG (horizontal direction) and accelerometry (y and z–axis). Conclusions: Both manual and electic shaving may produce ocular vibration and acceleration, which was equal to or less than other routine activities and may be allowable after surgery. Tooth–brushing may need further investigation.

Keywords: clinical laboratory testing • retinal detachment • trauma 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×