May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Nonresponders to latanoprost in normotensive normal subjects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Takahashi
    Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • T. Higashide
    Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • M. Sakurai
    Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • K. Sugiyama
    Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Takahashi, None; T. Higashide, None; M. Sakurai, None; K. Sugiyama, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 2102. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Takahashi, T. Higashide, M. Sakurai, K. Sugiyama; Nonresponders to latanoprost in normotensive normal subjects . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):2102.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Latanoprost has gained popularity as a first–line medication in normal–tension glaucoma. However, ‘nonresponders’ who lack response to latanoprost do exist. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of nonresponders and contributing factors to nonresponders in normotensive normal subjects. Methods: With informed consent approved by the IRB, baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by applanation tonometry (Goldmann) at 9 AM, 1:30 PM, 6 PM on day 0 in 46 normotensive normal subjects (40 males, 6 females, mean age 24.5±2.4y.o.). Central corneal thickness and refraction were also measured on day 0. At 9 AM on day 1 and each of the following 6 days, 0.005% latanoprost was applied to one eye. The other eye served as non–treated control. Diurnal IOP measurement was repeated on day 7. IOP decrease was calculated at each time point according to the following formula. IOP decrease ={(TpreTpost)–(CpreCpost)}÷Tpre*100(%), where T and C are IOP of treated and control eyes, respectively, and pre and post mean pre– and post– treatment corresponding to day 0 and day 7, respectively. Nonresponders were defined as subjects with the IOP decrease <10%. Conjunctival hyperemia in the treated eyes was evaluated on day 7. Results: Latanoprost significantly reduced mean diurnal IOP of treated eyes from 13.3±2.1 mmHg to 10.9±2.1 mmHg (p<0.0001, Student’s t–test), but did not alter the extent of diurnal fluctuation of IOP significantly. The magnitude of IOP decrease was similar among 3 time points. Mean diurnal IOP decrease was 18.2±10.2 % for all subjects, 4.4±3.3 % for nonresponders (n=11, 24%), and 22.5±7.3 % for responders (n=35, 76%). IOP at day 0, diurnal fluctuation of IOP at days 0 and 7, refraction, central corneal thickness, and severity of hyperemia of treated eyes were not significantly different between nonresponders and responders. Conclusions: One forth of normotensive normal subjects have little or low response to latanoprost.

Keywords: drug toxicity/drug effects • intraocular pressure • pharmacology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×