May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Linear Relationship of Motion Displacement Threshold with Stimulus Energy (calculated as a function of Contrast and Line Length)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G.M. Verdon–Roe
    Visual Science, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • A.C. Viswanathan
    Visual Science, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • M.C. Westcott
    St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • F.W. Fitzke
    Visual Science, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • D.F. Garway–Heath
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  G.M. Verdon–Roe, None; A.C. Viswanathan, None; M.C. Westcott, None; F.W. Fitzke, None; D.F. Garway–Heath, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 2122. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G.M. Verdon–Roe, A.C. Viswanathan, M.C. Westcott, F.W. Fitzke, D.F. Garway–Heath; Linear Relationship of Motion Displacement Threshold with Stimulus Energy (calculated as a function of Contrast and Line Length) . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):2122.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: to explore the relationship between motion displacement threshold (MDT) and stimulus energy, calculated as a function of contrast and line length. Methods: A video display under PC control was used to present a horizontal line stimulus in the nasal field at –27,3 degrees at a test distance of 30cm. The right eye of two experienced normal subjects (47 and 31 years) was tested with peripheral refraction corrected. A central target was fixated and the line stimulus (randomized presentation order of lengths 11, 22, 43, 86 or 128 min arc and contrast 25%, 40%, 55%, 60% or 85%) was programmed to pass through 5 presentations of displacements ranging 0–40 min arc. Stimulus presentation consisted of 3 oscillations of 200 msec per cycle duration. Each parameter was tested 3 times, frequency of seeing curves (FOS) were obtained and 50% seen threshold calculated by probit analysis. Results: There was a linear correlation of MDT with stimulus energy [stimulus area (min arc2) x luminance (cdm2)] when plotted as a log log function. The slope approximated –1 (–0.93 and –0.94 for each subject).  

Conclusions: A linear relationship of MDT with stimulus energy is demonstrated. These results suggest that the stimulus parameters tested lie within the area of linear summation at this peripheral location. This information will be applied to the development of a new multi–location MDT test for the early diagnosis of glaucoma. Supported by unrestricted grant from Pfizer.

Keywords: contrast sensitivity • motion–2D • perimetry 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×