May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN P48 AND M44 FORMS OF ARRESTIN IN VIVO
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Mendez
    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, USC–Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
  • A. Almuete
    Center for Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
  • K.A. Emelianoff
    Center for Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
  • N. Calero
    Center for Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
  • D.A. Baylor
    Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • M.E. Burns
    Center for Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
  • J. Chen
    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, USC–Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A. Mendez, None; A. Almuete, None; K.A. Emelianoff, None; N. Calero, None; D.A. Baylor, None; M.E. Burns, None; J. Chen, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY12155 (JC), EY14047 (MEB)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 2209. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Mendez, A. Almuete, K.A. Emelianoff, N. Calero, D.A. Baylor, M.E. Burns, J. Chen; FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN P48 AND M44 FORMS OF ARRESTIN IN VIVO . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):2209.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: to dissect the functional roles of arrestin splice variants p48 and p44 in the deactivation of photoactivated rhodopsin in vivo. Methods: selective expression of p48 or m44 (murine Arr1–370) splice variants of arrestin in murine rods was achieved by transgenic expression of either form in the arrestin knockout (Arr–/–) background. The content of transgenic arrestin in both lines (relative to endogenous arrestin in wildtype mice) were estimated to be about 140% (p48) and 8% (mArr1–370) in rod outer segment preparations from dark–adapted mice. The effect of each form on the light response kinetics was determined by single cell recordings; and the effect on the susceptibility of Arr–/– mice to light–damage was assayed by morphological analysis. Both p48 and m44 were also expressed in the rhodopsin kinase/arrestin (RK/Arr) double knockout background to determine their ability to quench the unphosphorylated receptor. Results: Rods expressing p48 and m44 yielded dim flash responses whose amplitude and recovery kinetics were indistinguishable from those of wildtype rods. At brighter flashes, the recovery of m44–expressing rods greatly slowed, presumably because the number of photoactivated rhodopsin molecules exceeded that of m44. In agreement with electrophysiological results, both p48 and m44 rescued the light–dependent degeneration observed in arrestin knockout mice reared under normal cyclic light conditions. However, only p48 was able to rescue the light–damage induced by a short exposure to a high intensity background light (2,000 lx). Experiments on RK/Arr double knockout rods suggest that in the absence of rhodopsin phosphorylation, the stochastic termination of the abnormally prolonged responses is likely due to a weak interaction of photoactivated rhodopsin with p48 arrestin in its basal state. In agreement with the described low affinity of p48 for photoactivated unphosphorylated rhodopsin, this binding appears to be reversible in nature at the single photon level. We do not observe this phosphorylation–independent effect on the p44–expressing line. Conclusions: We show that both p48 and p44 splice variants of arrestin can be functional in the intact cell, with p44 being able to completely quench rhodopsin activity under dim light conditions. However, p48 is the likely candidate to normally quench the rhodopsin molecules during the physiological response to light.

Keywords: photoreceptors • transgenics/knock–outs • signal transduction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×