May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
A predicted missense mutation of RPGR causes aberrant RNA splicing with exon skipping
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • F.Y. Demirci
    Ophthalmology, Univ. of Pittsburgh SOM, Pittsburgh, PA
  • A.L. Radak
    Human Genetics, Univ. of Pittsburgh GSPH, Pittsburgh, PA
  • B.W. Rigatti
    Ophthalmology, Univ. of Pittsburgh SOM, Pittsburgh, PA
  • T.S. Mah
    Ophthalmology, Univ. of Pittsburgh SOM, Pittsburgh, PA
  • M.B. Gorin
    Ophthalmology, Univ. of Pittsburgh SOM, Pittsburgh, PA
    Human Genetics, Univ. of Pittsburgh GSPH, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  F.Y. Demirci, None; A.L. Radak, None; B.W. Rigatti, None; T.S. Mah, None; M.B. Gorin, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY13130; NIH Core Grant EY08098; Eye & Ear Foundation of Pgh; RPB
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 2485. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      F.Y. Demirci, A.L. Radak, B.W. Rigatti, T.S. Mah, M.B. Gorin; A predicted missense mutation of RPGR causes aberrant RNA splicing with exon skipping . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):2485.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Mutations in the RPGR (retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator) isolated from RP3 region (Xp21.1) are responsible for up to 70% of X–linked (XL) retinitis pigmentosa (RP) families. RPGR exon ORF15 mutations also cause XL–atrophic macular degeneration and COD1 type XL–cone–rod dystrophy (CRD). During the RPGR mutation screening of DNA samples from our male patients with XL or isolated forms of RP or CRD, we identified a pathogenic nucleotide substitution (213G>A, last base of exon 2) that was predicted to cause a missense change (G52R) in the final protein. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this mutation could also alter the effectiveness of the adjacent splice junction. Methods: Total RNA was extracted from lymphocytes of the proband and his carrier mother. The cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription and used for PCR amplification of the RPGR by use of a forward primer from exon 1 and a reverse primer from exon 3. After gel checking, the amplified PCR products were purified and directly sequenced in an ABI377 automated sequencer. Results: Gel analysis of the PCR products revealed that the proband had a single aberrant band smaller than expected size and his mother showed both the normal and aberrant bands. Sequence analysis of the aberrant transcript showed skipping of exon 2 (126 nt) which leads to an RPGR protein with an in–frame deletion of 42 amino acids, affecting part of the critical RCC1–like domain. Conclusions: The last base of exons is conserved as a G in 80% of 5 splice site consensus sequences, and yet when changed, it can cause complete disruption of normal splicing as shown in our case. Our data confirms that RNA analysis is the only way to determine the molecular pathology caused by some DNA sequence changes. Other groups have reported a different base change at the same nucleotide position (213G>T) and proposed that it would act as a nonsense mutation (G52X). It is likely that the real action of this variant is also at the splicing level. Other presumed missense mutations can also be splicing related if they are located in exonic splicing enhancers. The knowledge of the exact effects of different mutations is important for genotype–phenotype correlations and for clarifying the molecular mechanisms of genetic diseases.

Keywords: retinal degenerations: hereditary • genetics • mutations 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×