May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Sensitivity analysis of uncertainties in strabismus surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Schutte
    Man Machine Systems, University of Technology Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
  • F.C. T. van der Helm
    Man Machine Systems, University of Technology Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
  • P.V. Pistecky
    Man Machine Systems, University of Technology Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
  • H.J. Simonsz
    Opthalmology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Schutte, None; F.C.T. van der Helm, None; P.V. Pistecky, None; H.J. Simonsz, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 2557. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Schutte, F.C. T. van der Helm, P.V. Pistecky, H.J. Simonsz; Sensitivity analysis of uncertainties in strabismus surgery . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):2557.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: In strabismus surgery reoperations are frequently necessary since the effect of surgery is influenced by uncertainties (error sources). Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the most influential uncertainties in strabismus surgery. Methods: Uncertainties were categorized as orthoptic and surgical measurement errors, anatomical and physiological variation and influence of binocular vision. For patients with infantile esotropia (ESO), accommodative esotropia (AE), esotropia with convergence excess (ECE) and exotropia (EXO). The contribution of each uncertainty was estimated by derivation of sensitivity and its measured or estimated variance. Contribution to variance of the effect was estimated for all uncertainties considered. Influence of anatomical and physiological factors was estimated using an analytical mechanical model of strabismus surgery, comprising muscle stiffness, stiffness in passive rotation and eye radius. Results:  

Conclusions: For all 4 categories of patients, orthoptic and surgical measurement errors and spring stiffness of the eye in passive rotation were most influential. There is a need for devices to measure the uncertain parameters more accurately, in order improve the outcomes of surgery.

Keywords: strabismus • strabismus: treatment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×