May 2004
Volume 45, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2004
Clinical evaluation of vernier acuity in amblyopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A.R. Fielder
    Ophthalmology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Y. Alaskary
    Ophthalmology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • C.E. Stewart
    Ophthalmology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • M.J. Moseley
    Ophthalmology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.R. Fielder, None; Y. Alaskary, None; C.E. Stewart, None; M.J. Moseley, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2004, Vol.45, 2570. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A.R. Fielder, Y. Alaskary, C.E. Stewart, M.J. Moseley; Clinical evaluation of vernier acuity in amblyopia . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45(13):2570.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To compare letter and vernier acuity in amblyopic and visually normal children. Methods: Data were obtained from 21 visually normal children (mean age = 5.7 ± 0.6 years) and 48 children with amblyopia (mean age = 6.2 ± 1.6 years) (strabismic (n=19), anisometropic (n=18), mixed (n=11)). Monocular measurements of logMAR letter acuity and vernier acuity using the forced–choice vernier test (Miller et al., Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2665) were recorded for all subjects. Results:Letter and vernier acuities for amblyopic eyes were significantly reduced (p<0.01) (0.41 ± 0.28 and –0.22 ± 0.49 logMAR respectively) compared to fellow eyes (0.04 ± 0.1 and –0.68 ± 0.18 logMAR). Letter acuities of amblyopic children’s fellow eyes and visually normal subjects’ eyes were identical (0.04 ± 0.1 and 0.04 ±0.05). In contrast fellow eyes demonstrated significantly reduced (p<0.01) vernier acuity compared to the visually normal group (–0.68 ± 0.18 and –0.8 ± 0.12 respectively). A greater amblyopic deficit was demonstrated for the vernier acuity task (p<0.01). No significant difference between letter acuity and vernier acuity scores or letter acuity/vernier acuity ratios were observed for the different categories of amblyopia. Vernier deficits were highly correlated to letter acuity deficits for anisometropic (r=0.93) and mixed (r=0.75) amblyopes, however strabismic amblyopes demonstrated a vernier acuity deficit independent of their letter acuity deficit (r=0.23). Conclusions:The vernier acuity task detected a greater amblyopic deficit suggesting the test would be more sensitive for the detection of amblyopia. Amblyopes fellow eyes demonstrated abnormalities in vernier acuity providing further evidence that the fellow eye of amblyopic observers is not normal. The vernier acuity deficit in strabismic amblyopes appears independent of letter acuity.

Keywords: amblyopia • visual acuity • visual development 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×